How much do surfaces tilt due to tidal forces?

AI Thread Summary
Tides deform the Earth's crust by approximately 40 cm, leading to a slight tilting effect as the tidal bulge approaches and recedes. This deformation can be visualized similarly to a surfboard riding a wave, where the local surface tilts slightly in response to the bulge. The discussion explores the maximum tilt experienced on Earth due to this tidal effect, estimating it to be around 0.013 arc-seconds. The analysis involves modeling the deformation as an ellipse, with calculations indicating that the tilt reaches its maximum near 45 degrees to the axes of the ellipse. Further examination of the sine wave approximation of the tidal effect suggests a maximum slope of about 6.283e-8, leading to a similar conclusion of approximately 0.01296 arc-seconds for the tilt. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the minute but measurable impact of tidal forces on the Earth's crust.
Adrian B
Messages
21
Reaction score
5
I've read that tides deform the Earth's crust by about 40cm. When I try to visualize the tidal bulge approaching me and then receding away from me, it seems like the local surface under my feet would tilt slightly one way as the bulge approaches, then level out, and then tilt slightly the other way as the bulge recedes. Similar to a surfboard as a wave passes underneath it.

Is this picture correct? If "yes" does anybody have a rough figure for the maximum tilt one would "experience" on Earth due to this? Arc-seconds? Micro arc-seconds?
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Say the deformation is to approximately an ellipse. Then the ellipse has a ratio of semi-major to semi-minor axes ##\frac{1+\epsilon}{1-\epsilon}## where ##\epsilon## is 40cm / 6371km = ##6\times 10^{-8}##. This can be modeled by the ellipse:

$$\frac{x^2}{(1+\epsilon)^2}+\frac{y^2}{(1-\epsilon)^2}=1$$

The tilt is the angle between the tangent to the ellipse and the line from the point on the ellipse to the origin, which is the centre of mass. That tilt is zero at the x and y intercepts. So it seems reasonable to guess that maximum tilt might be near angles of 45 degrees to the axes. There the angle of the line to COM is 45 degrees. The gradient of the ellipse is:

$$\frac{d}{dx}\left[(1-\epsilon)\sqrt{1-\frac{x^2}{(1+\epsilon)^2}}\right]=-\frac{(1-\epsilon)x}{\sqrt{1-\frac{x^2}{(1+\epsilon)^2}}}$$

##x## is approximately ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}## at that point, so this gives the gradient as ##1-1.3\times 10^{-7}##. Taking the arctan gives an angle that differs from 45 degrees by ##3\times 10^{-6}##. Multiplying that by ##60^2## gives about 0.013 seconds of arc.

E&OE
 
  • Like
Likes CalcNerd, jim mcnamara and Adrian B
andrewkirk said:
Multiplying that by 60^2 gives about 0.013 seconds of arc.
I agree.

An ellipse can be approximated by a circle of constant radius plus a significant 2'nd harmonic sinewave. One cycle of that 2'nd harmonic covers about 20 Mm, as that is half the Earth circumference, ignoring the flattening. (Remember that Napoleon declared the distance from the North Pole to the Equator, through Paris to be 10Mm, don't you just love the metric system).
If the vertical peak to peak Earth Tide amplitude is 0.4m, half that is the sinewave amplitude = 0.2 m
So scale the 20 Mm by 2π to get 3183100 m. The maximum slope of Sine is at zero = Cos(0) = 1.
Maximum slope of surface is therefore 0.2 in 3183100 = 6.283e-8.
Atan(6.283e-8) = 3.6e–6 deg = 0.01296 arcsec
 
Last edited:
Thanks folks!
 
On August 10, 2025, there was a massive landslide on the eastern side of Tracy Arm fjord. Although some sources mention 1000 ft tsunami, that height represents the run-up on the sides of the fjord. Technically it was a seiche. Early View of Tracy Arm Landslide Features Tsunami-causing slide was largest in decade, earthquake center finds https://www.gi.alaska.edu/news/tsunami-causing-slide-was-largest-decade-earthquake-center-finds...
Hello, I’m currently writing a series of essays on Pangaea, continental drift, and Earth’s geological cycles. While working on my research, I’ve come across some inconsistencies in the existing theories — for example, why the main pressure seems to have been concentrated in the northern polar regions. So I’m curious: is there any data or evidence suggesting that an external cosmic body (an asteroid, comet, or another massive object) could have influenced Earth’s geology in the distant...

Similar threads

Back
Top