How Much Energy is Needed to Move a Satellite to Infinity from Earth Orbit?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the minimum energy required to move a 7500 kg satellite from a circular orbit of radius 7.3 million meters to a location far from Earth, the Energy Principle is applied. The initial kinetic and potential energies must be considered, with the escape condition requiring that the total energy at infinity equals zero. The calculation shows that the binding energy of the satellite is GMm/2r, indicating that the previously calculated energy of approximately 4.13 x 10^11 J should be halved. The discussion also highlights the importance of accounting for the satellite's existing kinetic energy when calculating the energy needed for escape. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately determining the energy requirements for satellite maneuvers.
brometheus
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
A satellite of mass 7500 kg orbits the Earth in a circular orbit of radius of 7.3(10^6) m (this is above the Earth's atmosphere). The mass of the Earth is 6.0(10^24) kg.

What is the minimum amount of energy required to move the satellite from this orbit to a location very far away from the Earth?


We are supposed to employ the Energy Principle to solve this problem, so we start with:

K_i + U_i = K_f + U_f

We know that K (at low speeds) = (1/2)*m*(v^2) and U = -GmM/r


Using the Energy Principle, we know that

K_f - K_i = U_i - U_f

ΔK = -ΔU = -GmM[(1/r_f) - (1/r_i)]

Since r_f is very large, ΔK = GmM(1/r_i)

Using accepted and aforementioned values,
ΔK = [6.7(10^-11) * 7500 * 6(10^24)]/[7.3(10^6)]

This got me approximately 4.13(10^11)J, which is apparently incorrect. What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
brometheus said:
A satellite of mass 7500 kg orbits the Earth in a circular orbit of radius of 7.3(10^6) m (this is above the Earth's atmosphere). The mass of the Earth is 6.0(10^24) kg.

What is the minimum amount of energy required to move the satellite from this orbit to a location very far away from the Earth?We are supposed to employ the Energy Principle to solve this problem, so we start with:

K_i + U_i = K_f + U_f

We know that K (at low speeds) = (1/2)*m*(v^2) and U = -GmM/rUsing the Energy Principle, we know that

K_f - K_i = U_i - U_f

ΔK = -ΔU = -GmM[(1/r_f) - (1/r_i)]

Since r_f is very large, ΔK = GmM(1/r_i)

Using accepted and aforementioned values,
ΔK = [6.7(10^-11) * 7500 * 6(10^24)]/[7.3(10^6)]

This got me approximately 4.13(10^11)J, which is apparently incorrect. What am I doing wrong?
You are forgetting that it already has kinetic energy. If it gained GmM/R in kinetic energy it would have more than enough energy to escape.

In order to escape, it has to have just enough kinetic energy to get to an arbitrarily large distance from the Earth ie. where it has 0 kinetic and 0 potential energy.

So the condition for escape is: KE + U = 0

Can you write the equation for KEr+ Ur (hint: if there are no external forces acting, does KE + U change?)

Welcome to PF by the way!

AM
 
the binding energy of a satellite moving in an orbit is GMm/2r. so i think you ought to divide your answer by 2. [4.13*(10^11)] will be the answer if it is at rest on the Earth's surface.
PS: i am new here. could you please tell me how to start a new thread?
 
Ah, okay, that makes sense now. Thanks for your help, and the warm welcome!

To start a new thread I just went to the specific forum (Introductory Physics in this case) and clicked "New Topic" at the top right. It's in the same location as "New Reply" on this page.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top