How Much Energy is Spent Holding 1kg for an Hour?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jc.int
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
Holding 1 kilogram at a height of one meter for an hour does not involve any physical work in terms of displacement, as the object remains stationary. However, the human body expends energy due to the inefficiency of muscle contractions required to maintain the position, leading to fatigue. The energy expenditure is influenced more by individual factors like muscle tone and metabolism rather than the weight itself. In contrast, inanimate objects like a table do not consume energy to support weight. Thus, while no work is done in a physics sense, biological systems still require energy to maintain muscle tension.
jc.int
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
hello,
If I hold 1kilogram at one meter of the groud during an hour, what would be the theoretical energy I am spending (in joules for example)?

Thank you,
Jaimie
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're not doing any work because the displacement of the object is 0.

However, your muscles, as a biological system, are inefficient. To just bear a load without moving it, they must alternately contract and relax rapidly. As a result, your body expends chemical energy and you do end up feeling tired.
 
cepheid said:
You're not doing any work because the displacement of the object is 0.

However, your muscles, as a biological system, are inefficient. To just bear a load without moving it, they must alternately contract and relax rapidly. As a result, your body expends chemical energy and you do end up feeling tired.

Indeed. And as a result, the amount of energy expended depends more on your muscle tone, circulation, metabolism, etc. then on simple physics of the weight and gravity. Place the same kilogram on a solid table for an hour and it becomes obvious that no energy is being expended (the table does not run down its batteries/use up its fuel, etc.)
 
I agree with you but when a helicopter holds a weight it is using energy to compense the gravity force, isn't it?
 
Yes, because once again, it is inefficient. A helium balloon can hold a weight as well, and it would require no energy input to do so.
 

Thread 'The Effect of Linear and Rotational Motion on Measured Weight'

Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
View full post »

Thread 'Coulomb gauge implies instantaneous radial electric field?'

Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
View full post »
Thread 'Does Poisson's equation hold due to vector potential cancellation?'

Thread 'Does Poisson's equation hold due to vector potential cancellation?'

Imagine that two charged particles, with charge ##+q##, start at the origin and then move apart symmetrically on the ##+y## and ##-y## axes due to their electrostatic repulsion. The ##y##-component of the retarded Liénard-Wiechert vector potential at a point along the ##x##-axis due to the two charges is $$ \begin{eqnarray*} A_y&=&\frac{q\,[\dot{y}]_{\mathrm{ret}}}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 c^2[(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}+y\dot{y}/c]_{\mathrm{ret}}}\tag{1}\\...
View full post »

Similar threads

I I'm calculating more energy out than I put in
3
Replies
138
Views
8K
I Same old question, I still don't get it: E=1/2mv^2 - more E with V?
Replies
41
Views
4K
Is this a new and useful source of energy?
Replies
5
Views
1K
B Rotating Capacitor: Concentrating energy using accessible technology
Replies
5
Views
2K
B How is 1N enough to move a 0.1kg apple 1 meter high?
Replies
8
Views
2K
B Energy changes that result when something drops from a height
Replies
12
Views
2K
I How much energy is needed to blow up stone (and other materials)?
Replies
28
Views
3K
I Gravitational potential energy
Replies
46
Views
5K
I How to calculate the kinetic energy of an object propelled by a magnet?
Replies
15
Views
1K
B What happens to the energy when you are holding a book?
Replies
6
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top