How Much Energy is Spent Holding 1kg for an Hour?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jc.int
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Holding 1 kilogram at a height of one meter for an hour does not involve mechanical work, as the displacement of the object is zero. However, the human body expends energy due to the inefficiency of muscle contractions required to maintain the position. Factors such as muscle tone, circulation, and metabolism significantly influence the energy expenditure, rather than just the weight and gravity. In contrast, inanimate objects like a table do not expend energy to hold weight, while machines like helicopters do require energy to counteract gravitational forces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, particularly work and energy.
  • Knowledge of human physiology, specifically muscle function and energy expenditure.
  • Familiarity with the principles of mechanical systems and energy efficiency.
  • Basic comprehension of gravitational forces and their effects on objects.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of mechanical work in physics and its mathematical definition.
  • Explore human muscle physiology and the biochemical processes involved in energy expenditure.
  • Investigate the efficiency of various mechanical systems, such as helicopters and balloons, in lifting weights.
  • Study the principles of energy conservation and how they apply to both living organisms and inanimate objects.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, fitness enthusiasts, physiologists, and engineers interested in understanding energy expenditure in biological and mechanical systems.

jc.int
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
hello,
If I hold 1kilogram at one meter of the groud during an hour, what would be the theoretical energy I am spending (in joules for example)?

Thank you,
Jaimie
 
Science news on Phys.org
You're not doing any work because the displacement of the object is 0.

However, your muscles, as a biological system, are inefficient. To just bear a load without moving it, they must alternately contract and relax rapidly. As a result, your body expends chemical energy and you do end up feeling tired.
 
cepheid said:
You're not doing any work because the displacement of the object is 0.

However, your muscles, as a biological system, are inefficient. To just bear a load without moving it, they must alternately contract and relax rapidly. As a result, your body expends chemical energy and you do end up feeling tired.

Indeed. And as a result, the amount of energy expended depends more on your muscle tone, circulation, metabolism, etc. then on simple physics of the weight and gravity. Place the same kilogram on a solid table for an hour and it becomes obvious that no energy is being expended (the table does not run down its batteries/use up its fuel, etc.)
 
I agree with you but when a helicopter holds a weight it is using energy to compense the gravity force, isn't it?
 
Yes, because once again, it is inefficient. A helium balloon can hold a weight as well, and it would require no energy input to do so.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
615
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
533
Replies
5
Views
710