How Much Force Can Be Applied Before the Top Box Slips?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the maximum horizontal force that can be applied to the larger box without the smaller box slipping, the static friction force must be calculated using the coefficient of friction and the weight of the smaller box. The static friction force is given by the product of the coefficient of static friction (0.25) and the normal force, which is the weight of the smaller box (2.2 kg). The net force equations must be set up correctly, considering both static and kinetic friction. The user is seeking clarification on the logic behind the calculations and the correct approach to solving the problem. Understanding the relationship between the forces and the coefficients of friction is crucial for finding the solution.
Kakateo
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A box with a mass of 2.2 kg sits on top of another box with a mass of 3.8 kg. The coefficient of friction between the two boxes is 0.25, and the coefficient or kinetic friction between the larger box and the horizontal surface is 0.32. Determine the largest horizontal force that can be applied to the larger box so that the smaller box does not slip off.

Homework Equations



Let fs be friction static
Let fs be friction kinetic

Fnet = Fa - Ffk
Fnet = Fa - Ffs

The Attempt at a Solution



I made Fnet for equation #2 0. I isolated each for force applied for each of the equations and set them equal to each other.

My equation before plugging numbers in for variables was this:

Ffk = Fnet + Ffs

I tried expanding the equation then solving for acceleration in which I got a negative value so I know I did something wrong.

I'd like to know the logic behind solving this equation and the process itselfThanks so much
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Kakateo http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/5725/red5e5etimes5e5e45e5e25.gif

Determine the largest force that can be transferred (via friction) to the top box.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top