How Much Force is Needed to Hold a Flagpole Motionless?

  • Thread starter Thread starter thousandsaints
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque
AI Thread Summary
A man is trying to determine the force needed to hold a 7.5 m, 29 kg flagpole motionless by pulling on a rope attached to its top. The key equations involve calculating torque from both the weight of the flagpole and the force exerted by the man. The initial calculations incorrectly used the wrong points for torque application, leading to confusion. It is suggested to treat the force of gravity as acting on the center of mass and to draw a free body diagram for clarity. Correcting these details will help find the equilibrium force needed to keep the pole stationary.
thousandsaints
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I really need help understanding this problem. I'd be really thankful if someone could explain it to me.

Homework Statement



A man is attempting to raise a 7.5 m long, 29 kg flagpole that has a hinge at the base by pulling on a rope attached to the top of the pole. The figure of the problem is below as an attachment

With what force does the man have to pull on the rope to hold the pole motionless in this position?

Homework Equations



\tau=F*r\bot

Net torque = 0

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried finding the torque caused the weight of the flagpole, and then the torque caused by the man. From that I tried finding the force which the man exerts. But I can't find the correct answer.

Torque from gravity = w*r\bot =mg*Lcos(\Theta) =(9.81*29)*7.5cos30 = 1848 Nm

Torque from the man = F*r\bot = F*Ltan\Theta = F*7.5tan20 = F*2.73m

The two torque values should equal each other. so...

1848 Nm = F*2.73m
F= 1848 Nm / 2.73
F= 676.8 N
 

Attachments

  • problem.jpg
    problem.jpg
    4.7 KB · Views: 892
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the question asking for? You haven't really stated that.
 
Your general method will work assuming your trying to find equilibrium (i.e. the pole isn't moving).
The problem with the details of your calculation however, is the gravity.
For any uniform (in density) object, you can treat the force of gravity as acting on the center of mass (not the end of the pole which you have done in the equation).

It might help if you draw a free body diagram of the pole, to help visualize the difference in radii.
 
sorry about that. I edited the post above.

The question is:
With what force does the man have to pull on the rope to hold the pole motionless in this position?
 
Welcome to PF!

thousandsaints said:
Torque from gravity = w*r =mg*Lcos() =(9.81*29)*7.5cos30 = 1848 Nm

Torque from the man = F*r = F*Ltan = F*7.5tan20 = F*2.73m

Hi thousandsaints! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(You haven't said, but I assume you're taking torques about the end of the pole on the ground).

In the first equation, you only need half the length (as lzkelley says)! :rolleyes:

In the second equation, I suspect you've drawn the wrong right-angled triangle … it isn't tan20. :smile:
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top