How Much Heat Does the Range Element Transfer in an Isovolumetric Process?

AI Thread Summary
In an isovolumetric process involving a pressure cooker with 2.0 kg of water, the internal energy increases by 8.0 x 10^3 J, while 2.0 x 10^3 J is lost to the surrounding air. The first law of thermodynamics indicates that since work is zero, the heat added to the system (Q) equals the change in internal energy (ΔU). Therefore, the total heat transferred from the range element to the pressure cooker includes both the energy that increases internal energy and the energy lost to the air, resulting in Q' = Q + 2.0 x 10^3 J. Understanding this relationship clarifies how to calculate the total heat transferred in the process.
interXdragon
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Q = ?
ΔU = + 8.0x10^3
W = perhaps 0 since isovolumetric?
Energy Lost = -2.0x10^3
Mass of Water = 2.0 kg


Homework Equations



I'm stuck on this thermal dynamics problem. It states: "A 2.0 kg quantity of water is held at constant volume in a puressure cooker and is heated by a range elment. The system's interal energy increases by 8.0 x 10^3 J. However, the pressure cooker is not well insulated, and 2.0 x 10^3 J of energy is transferred to the surrounding air. How much energy is trasferred from te range elment to the pressure cooker as heat?"


The Attempt at a Solution



I know that is is an isovolumetric problem, and in my book, that means work is equal to zero. Since 'w' is taken out of the equation, I solved it by Q = 8.0x10^3 J, from ΔU = Q - W. I then subtracted that by 2.0x10^3 J. My answer was completely off. What am I thinking wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your on the right track. Consider the first law of thermodynamics, which are you correctly state is \Delta U = Q - W and as you correctly say, the process is isochoric \Rightarrow W = 0. So now we have \Delta U = Q where Q is the heat added to the system; this is the heat transferred to the pressure cooker which raised to internal energy. Now, if Q' is the heat transferred from the element is the pressure cooker and the surrounding air, then Q'=Q+2.0x103. Does that make sense?
 
thanks to that, now i have the right answer! but I'm still confused on the last sentence. i don't see why we should include 2.0 x 10^3 J into the transferred heat.
 
interXdragon said:
thanks to that, now i have the right answer! but I'm still confused on the last sentence. i don't see why we should include 2.0 x 10^3 J into the transferred heat.
Okay, you are given that the internal energy of the pressure cooker is increased by \Delta U, from the first law of thermodynamics you can calculate that Q joules of heat must be transferred to the pressure cooker from the element (in this case [isochoric] note that \Delta U = Q). Now, the element also supplies 2.0 x 10^3 J to the air so the total heat the element supplies is the sum of those two values.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top