How much will the aluminum wire stretch under a 3.57 kg load?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Schu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stretch
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the stretch of an aluminum wire under a 3.57 kg load. Using Young's Modulus for aluminum, participants derived the formula for stretch, leading to a correct result of approximately 0.4 mm. One user initially calculated an implausible stretch of 2572 m, prompting a review of their calculations. After reevaluating the inputs and formula rearrangement, the accurate stretch was confirmed to be around 3.88 mm. The conversation emphasizes careful unit management and verification of calculations in physics problems.
Schu
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
How much will the aluminum stretch

a 3.57 kg mass is supported by an aluminum wire with a length of 2.43 m and a diameter of 2.01mm. How much will the wire stretch?
Young's Modolus for Al= 6.9 * 10^10

First get the cross sectional area of the Al

then plug it into the formula
Y = Fl/A(delta)l

I come out with like 2572 m which just doesn't seem right. Where am I going wrong? I have checked the math and averything is in m and kg.
HELP​
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I found a result of 3.8830...10^-4m~.4mm.
delta(l)=(F*l)/(A*Y) with a force of mg=3.57kg(9.8m/s^2)=34.986N*m--->
F*l=34.986*2.43=85.01598 and A*Y=pi*((2.01/2)*10^-3)^2)(m^2)*(6.9*10^10)*(N/m^2)=218943.0113.. N ---->
delta(l)=85.01598N*m/218943.0113...N=3.8830...*10^-4m~.4mm
--->delta(l)~.4mm. I think you made a mistake somewhere,check everything again.
 
You see I also made a mistake in the units, when I wrote mg=34.986N*m, I think that we should be more careful.

wisky40
 
Schu said:
Y = Fl/A(delta)l
Nothing wrong with this formula, but you'll have to rearrange it to find \Delta L:
\Delta L = \frac {L F}{Y A}
I come out with like 2572 m which just doesn't seem right. Where am I going wrong? I have checked the math and averything is in m and kg.
I'm glad you realize that your answer doesn't make sense. The only thing to do is to show exactly what numbers you plugged in, so we can check for an error.

wisky40's answer of about 0.4 mm is correct.
 
I went through it again after rearranging the formula, I'm not sure why I got what I did before but I came out with about 3.88 mm

THanks for the help.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top