How must one go about learning physics at a younger age?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on how to effectively learn physics, particularly for a middle school student eager to expand their knowledge. Participants emphasize the importance of reading widely, utilizing local libraries, and avoiding television programs that may present misleading information. Recommended online resources include HyperPhysics, Wikipedia's science portal, and Physics Classroom. A notable suggestion is the book "Thinking Physics" by Lewis Carroll Epstein, which incorporates puzzles and brainteasers to make learning engaging.Concerns are raised about certain scientific concepts often portrayed in media, such as multiverses, wormholes, and theories like string theory, which, while professionally researched, remain untestable and should be approached with caution. Participants stress the need to differentiate between verified facts and speculative ideas, particularly when discussing advanced theories that are not yet substantiated by empirical evidence. Overall, the focus is on building a solid foundation in physics through reliable resources and critical thinking.
TorqueDork
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hello all! I joined this illustrious community with the hopes of expanding what little knowledge I know about physics, calculus, and general sciences. I am wondering, how should I learn physics. I am in middle school, am generally intelligent if I can say so myself, and have a thirst for learning that I am attempting to quench. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Generally one just reads anything they can get their hands on. Your local library should have a wealth of information on a huge variety of subjects. Plus theirs always bookstores, online sources, etc. Just avoid anything on TV and you should be okay. TV shows typically offer little real knowledge and claim certain things are true that just aren't.

If you want to get into a career in science, focus on your schoolwork. All of it.

For online sources I recommend the following:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/hframe.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Science
http://www.physicsclassroom.com/
 
Drakkith said:
Generally one just reads anything they can get their hands on. Your local library should have a wealth of information on a huge variety of subjects. Plus theirs always bookstores, online sources, etc. Just avoid anything on TV and you should be okay. TV shows typically offer little real knowledge and claim certain things are true that just aren't.

If you want to get into a career in science, focus on your schoolwork. All of it.

For online sources I recommend the following:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/hframe.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Science
http://www.physicsclassroom.com/

Does that TV rule apply with programs from renowned physicist, such as "Into the Universe with Stephen Hawking"?
EDIT: And thanks for replying!
 
TorqueDork said:
Does that TV rule apply with programs from renowned physicist, such as "Into the Universe with Stephen Hawking"?
EDIT: And thanks for replying!

Sometimes. Especially if the person says something along the lines of "Our universe is only one of many", or "Wormholes can take us places", etc. Anything so fantastic that we can't use it any time soon is most likely either false or an exaggeration.
 
TorqueDork said:
Hello all! I joined this illustrious community with the hopes of expanding what little knowledge I know about physics, calculus, and general sciences. I am wondering, how should I learn physics. I am in middle school, am generally intelligent if I can say so myself, and have a thirst for learning that I am attempting to quench. Any ideas?

A fun way to learn is through puzzles / brainteasers. Here is a book full of them:
Thinking Physics by Lewis Carroll Epstein
 
Drakkith said:
Sometimes. Especially if the person says something along the lines of "Our universe is only one of many", or "Wormholes can take us places", etc. Anything so fantastic that we can't use it any time soon is most likely either false or an exaggeration.

So are you saying that our universe stands alone and wormholes can't take us places? Or are you just saying they are simply not facts.
 
A.T. said:
A fun way to learn is through puzzles / brainteasers. Here is a book full of them:
Thinking Physics by Lewis Carroll Epstein

I will look into it,
 
  • #10
TorqueDork said:
So are you saying that our universe stands alone and wormholes can't take us places? Or are you just saying they are simply not facts.

We haven't observed other universes, nor have we jumped through wormholes to other places, so they're both unjustified claims. We don't know enough to say anything definitive about them.
 
  • #11
TorqueDork said:
So are you saying that our universe stands alone and wormholes can't take us places? Or are you just saying they are simply not facts.

I'm saying that you should be wary of anyone who presents them as if they were verified facts.
 
  • #12
Drakkith said:
I'm saying that you should be wary of anyone who presents them as if they were verified facts.

Thanks for the advice.
 
  • #14
Hi TorqueDork, and welcome! It's nice to hear you like physics and science! :smile:

I'd like to add the following concepts to watch out for:

Multiverse, parallel universes, extra (spatial) dimensions, time travel to the past, antigravity, faster-than-light travel, matter teleportation, particles as strings (currently untestable). These concepts range from theoretical to hypothetical to science fiction, and none of them are by any means facts today, far from. Be wary of anyone who presents any of these concepts as if they were verified facts. There are more concepts to watch out for, but those I mentioned are some reoccurring concepts I come to think of at the moment. I mention these concepts because they sometimes appear in various tv programs and you might stumble upon them on the net. Be wary when you encounter these!

PS. Also beware of the good ol' "perpetual motion" and "free energy" devices, which violate the first or second law of thermodynamics.
 
  • #15
DennisN said:
Hi TorqueDork, and welcome! It's nice to hear you like physics and science! :smile:

I'd like to add the following concepts to watch out for:

Multiverse, parallel universes, extra (spatial) dimensions, time travel to the past, antigravity, faster-than-light travel, matter teleportation, particles as strings (currently untestable). These concepts range from theoretical to hypothetical to science fiction, and none of them are by any means facts today, far from. Be wary of anyone who presents any of these concepts as if they were verified facts. There are more concepts to watch out for, but those I mentioned are some reoccurring concepts I come to think of at the moment. I mention these concepts because they sometimes appear in various tv programs and you might stumble upon them on the net. Be wary when you encounter these!

PS. Also beware of the good ol' "perpetual motion" and "free energy" devices, which violate the first or second law of thermodynamics.

Thank you for the greeting! I also am happy you are telling me these things, but string theory, is after all a theory. So why be wary of the theory?
 
  • #16
TorqueDork said:
Thank you for the greeting! I also am happy you are telling me these things, but string theory, is after all a theory. So why be wary of the theory?

String Theory is a professionally researched theory (or theories) so it is allowed to discuss on this forum. But the theory is (sadly) not testable yet. So if anyone says to you something like "particles are made of strings", this is not correct. We can't say that, String Theory has not come that far. The current mainstream model of particles is the so-called Standard Model, no more, no less. In the Standard Model the fundamental particles ("building blocks") are the elementary particles (quarks, leptons and bosons). No strings attached :smile:.
 
Last edited:
  • #17
  • #18
Thanks, and thanks dennis.
 
  • #19
A.T. said:
A fun way to learn is through puzzles / brainteasers. Here is a book full of them:
Thinking Physics by Lewis Carroll Epstein

For what its worth, I second this suggested book.

I wish I had found it when I was younger snd I frequently refer to it for inspiration when teaching freshmen.
 
  • #20
ZombieFeynman said:
For what its worth, I second this suggested book.

I wish I had found it when I was younger snd I frequently refer to it for inspiration when teaching freshmen.

It's worth quite a bit, thank you.
 

Similar threads

Replies
71
Views
679
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
184
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
378
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top