How objects look at high speeds

  • Thread starter Thread starter gaavslev
  • Start date Start date
gaavslev
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have some questions about light rays that are emitted from objects moving at high speeds relative to some observer. If an object, say a pole, is moving toward me at a velocity v the light rays from the end closest to me will arrive at my eye before the light rays from the back of the pole. And since the pole is moving toward me there will be some light ray emitted from the front of it at a later time that will arrive at my eye at the same time the light ray from the back of the pole from an earlier time arrives. Does this mean that to me the object would appear to be longer? Or does something in relativity modify things so that the length of the pole will appear as it should--contracted from its proper length?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thank you for the link! This is exactly the stuff I was wondering about! I hadn't even thought about rotation, and they talk about the length expansion effect that I was wondering about too. I was starting to think I had missed something, but I didn't. Thank you.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top