How Precisely Can the Position of a Flying Mosquito Be Known?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the position uncertainty of a flying mosquito with a mass of 0.15 mg and a speed of 50 cm/s, considering a velocity uncertainty of 0.5 mm/s. The key equation used is the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, Δp * Δx = ħ/2, where Δp represents the uncertainty in momentum. Participants clarify that the correct approach involves calculating the uncertainty in momentum (Δp) using the mass and the uncertainty in velocity (Δv). The final goal is to determine the uncertainty in position (Δx), not the actual position or momentum. Understanding the distinction between actual values and uncertainties is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
zoner7
Messages
89
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A mosquito of mass .15mg is found to be flying at a speed of 50 cm/s within an uncertainly of .5 mm/s.

a) How precisely can it's position be known?


Homework Equations



Delta p * Delta x = h bar / 2
p = mv

The Attempt at a Solution



I look at problem originally and simply solved for momentum using the given velocity 50 cm/s. Then i plugged that into the delta x * delta p = h bar / 2.
I got the answer 7.033 X 10^-31

Then I realized that I never used the variable describing the uncertainly of the fly's velocity. Clearly this is relevant to the solution of the problem. I think that I calculated the acutal momentum, as opposed to the uncertaintly of momentum, which the above equation calls for. How am I supposed to differentiate between the actual velocity and the uncertaintly of velocity?

Does the problem want me to give a range of positions? I could solve for the uncertainly of momentum using 50 cm/s + or - .5 mm/s. Could I then could find a max and a min position using the uncertainly equation? What exactly should I be solving for?

Thank you in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zoner7 said:
I look at problem originally and simply solved for momentum using the given velocity 50 cm/s. Then i plugged that into the delta x * delta p = h bar / 2.

You found momentum p, which is not what the equation uses. It uses delta p.

Given that p=mv , then \Delta p=m\Delta v.

The problem just wants to know delta x.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top