How Should I Arrange Magnets for Optimal Induced Current in a Low Temp Engine?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on optimizing magnet arrangement for a low-temperature engine with a piston made of neodymium magnets set in graphite. The user seeks to control the piston throw using fixed magnets, considering various configurations to maximize induced current in a surrounding coil. Key considerations include the interaction of magnetic flux lines and the impact of using like versus unlike poles. The user is also contemplating whether a single magnet in the piston might be more effective. Ultimately, understanding the basic principles of magnetism—like poles repel and unlike poles attract—guides the design choices.
72Zorad
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I dabble in miniature milling/machining with my home CNC setup. I'm building a low temperature engine and have a question. The piston will be a neodymium magnet(s) set in graphite. Rather than using mechanical linkages and a crankshaft I want to use magnets to control the length of throw. By adjusting the position of the two 'controlling' magnets I should be able to control the throw of the piston.
Imagine a shaker flashlight with the magnet(s) set in graphite and two opposing magnets halting the movement of the magnet at each end of the slide. Attachment included if you want to visualize it. You can move, zoom, rotate, or hide parts to visualize it better if necessary.

The intention is to build a configuration that induces the most current in a coil around the cylinder.

My question is; If I put a magnet on each end of the piston and want to use two more magnets to control the throw should I arrange then

N (fixed magnet) N(fixed magnet)
S (fixed magnet) S(fixed magnet)

S (piston) S(piston)
N (piston) N(piston)
or
N (piston) S(piston)
S (piston) N(piston)

S (fixed magnet) N(fixed magnet)
N (fixed magnet) S(fixed magnet)

I understand the flux lines will impact each other and am looking for the optimal configuration. The throw of the piston is only about .6 inches. Should I perhaps use a single magnet in the piston?

Thanks,

72Zorad
 

Attachments

Engineering news on Phys.org
I don't claim to understand your diagram or what you're doing. However, like poles repel and unlike poles attract. That seems to answer your question.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top