emma
- 3
- 0
Hello, I would like to ask if I have this data from impedance spectroscopy: frequency, Z(im), Z(Real), how should I calculate conductivity ? Should I use R(im) or R(re)?
The discussion revolves around calculating conductivity from impedance spectroscopy data, specifically focusing on the use of imaginary and real components of impedance (Z(im) and Z(Real)). Participants explore the implications of frequency data and phase information in determining conductivity, particularly for a perovskite material at a specific temperature.
Participants express varying opinions on the best approach to calculate conductivity, with no consensus reached on the use of phase information or the appropriateness of averaging multiple conductivity values.
The discussion highlights limitations in the assumptions made about the relevance of phase information and the implications of using a wide frequency range for conductivity measurements.
Welcome to the PF.emma said:Hello, I would like to ask if I have this data from impedance spectroscopy: frequency, Z(im), Z(Real), how should I calculate conductivity ? Should I use R(im) or R(re)?
Why do you need the conductivity measured over that wide frequency range? What is the application? Why not just measure it at the single frequency of interest?emma said:Frequency is from 1MHz to 1 Hz, material is perovskite. Ionic conductivity has to be calculated from sigma=L/R*A(where L- distance between electrodes, A- cross section area, R- resistivity). :) Problem is that there is whole range of data of frequency and R'', R' values so i get a lot of conductivity data. And I just need one value in particular temperature. I suppose it is quite stupid (or not) to calculate average. So maybe phase can determine which value do i need?