How to Accurately Measure Vertical Distance in Projectile Experiments?

  • Thread starter Thread starter asha
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To accurately measure the vertical distance in projectile experiments, it is important to consider the release height from the curved ramp, which can be measured from the center of the ball for consistency. Using a ruler placed alongside the ramp can be challenging, so ensuring a clear line of sight to the ball's position is crucial. The radius of the circular part of the ramp should also be taken into account for precise calculations. Additionally, applying the conservation of total energy can aid in understanding the relationship between release height and projectile range. For more complex analyses, incorporating rotational inertia may be necessary.
asha
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have to investigate the relationship between the range of the projectile by the distance the ball is released from the curved ramp. I want to measure the the vertical distance the ball is released when on the curved ramp which is placed on a table.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I have tried to measure the vertical distance by placing a ruler next to where the curved ramp is clamped but i find it hard to measure the distance the ball is from the ball accurately. What can i do inorder to accurately measure the vertical distance?

I'm also unsure if i should measure from the centre of the ball or the peak of the ball when measuring the vertical distance. Where shall i measure from?

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello ?

marlon

edit : assume the ball to be a point particle (approximation) you must apply conservation of total energy. What you need to know is the radius of the circular part of the ramp. The height from which you release the object on that ramp can be measured as well as the range.

If you want to bring in the I tensor (ie rotational inertia), then things get slightly more complicated.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top