How to Calculate Angular Velocity and Acceleration for a Rotating Cylinder?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the initial angular acceleration of a rotating cylinder, the parallel axis theorem is applied, resulting in an inertia value of 0.675 kg·m². The torque is calculated using the formula T = R * F, yielding a torque of 14.7 N·m, which leads to an angular acceleration of approximately 21.78 rad/s². For determining the angular velocity when the cylinder is directly below the axle, the discussion suggests using conservation of rotational kinetic energy and gravitational potential energy, as this approach simplifies the calculations compared to kinematic equations. The need for assistance in part B indicates a lack of clarity on how to proceed with this method. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of energy conservation principles in solving angular motion problems.
Zhadows
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 5.0 kg, 60-cm diameter disk rotates on an axle passing through one edge. The axle is parallel to the floor. The cylinder is held with the center of mass at the same height as the axle, then released.

a. What is the cylinder's initial angular Acceleration?
b*. What is the cylinder's angular Velocity when it is directly below the axle?


Homework Equations



I=Icm+MD^2

A=T/I

The Attempt at a Solution



Part A: I utilized the Parallel axis theorem because it was rotating off the center of mass.
I=Icm+MD^2->[I of disc] (1/2 (5)(0.3)^2) + 5(.3)^2= 0.675

For the torque: T=R*F->(0.3)(5*9.8)=14.7

14.7/0.675= 21.78 Rad/S^2

Can someone tell me if I did something incorrect? Also:

Part B: I have no idea where to start. This is where I really need help.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try Conservation of rotational kinetic energy.
 
Try using the kinematics equations replacing x with (radians), v with (angular velocity) and a with angular acceleration. I will reply if with additional information if you follow up on this.
 
I think conservation of total energy is the best approach here; the increase in rotational kinetic energy must equal the decrease in gravitational potential energy. A kinematic approach would be more difficult since the angular acceleration is not constant.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top