How to calculate magnetic flux from voltage?

AI Thread Summary
Magnetic flux density is measured in Teslas or Webers per square meter, and voltage is calculated using Faraday's law of induction, represented by the formula E = -N dφ/dt. The time function in this formula indicates that voltage is induced when there is a change in magnetic flux over time; if there is no movement or change, no voltage is generated. A constant current in a coil produces a steady magnetic field, but without a change in current, there is no induced voltage. The strength of the magnetic field is influenced by the current amount, the number of coil turns, and the core material. Understanding these principles is essential for calculating magnetic flux from voltage effectively.
Nads
Messages
5
Reaction score
3
I understand that magnetic flux density is measured in Teslas or Weber’s per square meter and that voltage or emf is measured using faraday’s law of induction which is
E= - N dφ/dt
Where
N= number parallel fields
Φ = magnetic flux (Wb)
E= emf (V)
What I don’t understand is the time function of the formula. If we rearranged the formula to make flux the subject what would the time function represent? Correct me if I’m wrong but If there is constant voltage and current through a coil then there is a constant magnetic field inside the coil (or through the core if there is one).

In this situation, what does the time variable represent?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Nads said:
If there is constant voltage and current through a coil then there is a constant magnetic field inside the coil

You are confused because of the contradiction in your sentence. If the current in an ideal coil is steady, there is a constant field, and there is no voltage. The voltage across a coil is proportional to the rate of change of current. That is where time comes in.
 
  • Like
Likes Nads
Thank you for clarifying that.
So if there is no rate of change in current there is no voltage.
 
Nads said:
I understand that magnetic flux density is measured in Teslas or Weber’s per square meter and that voltage or emf is measured using faraday’s law of induction which is
E= - N dφ/dt
Where
N= number parallel fields
Φ = magnetic flux (Wb)
E= emf (V)
What I don’t understand is the time function of the formula. If we rearranged the formula to make flux the subject what would the time function represent? Correct me if I’m wrong but If there is constant voltage and current through a coil then there is a constant magnetic field inside the coil (or through the core if there is one).

In this situation, what does the time variable represent?

Hi @Nads
The formula you gave works to find the voltage generated in a coil when their is a magnetic field affecting the coil. If you have a permanent magnet and a coil of wire on a table next to each other and not moving, then there is no voltage induced in the coil. Now if you move one of them there is a voltage induced in the coil - the faster you move them in relation to each other the higher the voltage. That is the time term, dt, in the formula. Also, the more the magnetic field changes, dφ, the higher the voltage.

There is a simulation of this at: https://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/electromag/java/faraday2/

For the second part of your understanding, when a wire, or a coil, has current flowing thru it there is a magnetic field generated. Which end is North or South depends on which direction the current is flowing. If there is AC flowing, the field varies with the AC. In either case, AC or DC, the strength of the field is determined by the amount of current, the number of coil turns, and if there is a core, what material is used for a core.

Cheers,
Tom
 
  • Like
Likes Nads
Tom.G said:
Hi @Nads
The formula you gave works to find the voltage generated in a coil when their is a magnetic field affecting the coil. If you have a permanent magnet and a coil of wire on a table next to each other and not moving, then there is no voltage induced in the coil. Now if you move one of them there is a voltage induced in the coil - the faster you move them in relation to each other the higher the voltage. That is the time term, dt, in the formula. Also, the more the magnetic field changes, dφ, the higher the voltage.

There is a simulation of this at: https://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/electromag/java/faraday2/

For the second part of your understanding, when a wire, or a coil, has current flowing thru it there is a magnetic field generated. Which end is North or South depends on which direction the current is flowing. If there is AC flowing, the field varies with the AC. In either case, AC or DC, the strength of the field is determined by the amount of current, the number of coil turns, and if there is a core, what material is used for a core.

Cheers,
Tom

Thank you, I found the simulation helpful.
 
  • Like
Likes Tom.G
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top