How to calculate magnitude of magnetic field

Aquam
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Ill try to translate as good as possible.

Electrons are sent through potential difference of 2500V. Then they get into transverse magnetic field where they move in circular arc with 22cm radius. What is the magnitude of magnetic field?

So the radius is= 22cm
and the potential difference is 2500V.


Homework Equations



B= u0 I / 2 Pi r

I don't know how to calculate I out of this formula, so i can calculate B (magnitude of m.f.)

Or i have missed the solution to this problem completely? Please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your equation is for calculating B from current, but in this question the B field is already there before the electrons went into, and this B field also accounts for the centripetal force which pulls the electrons into circular motion, provided the fact that the electrons have velocities after accelerated by the potential, and the B field is transverse.

So I guess the solving strategy is like this: get the kinetic energy of electrons from the 2500V potential difference, and together with the radius you can have the acceleration, just like we did in classical mechanics. Then the force F is obvious and B can be derived from F = Bqv.

I haven't touched EM for years, so cannot promise this answer is right.

Good luck.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top