How to Calculate psi(x) from A(k) in Quantum Physics Homework?

Felicity
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



this problem is from (chapter 2 problem 1, gasiorowicz, quantum physics) where I am given
A(k) = N/(k2+a2) and must calculate psi(x)


Homework Equations



I am using the equation
psi(x,t) = integral from - infinity to + infinity A(k) ei(kx-wt) dk

which when t=0 goes to

psi(x,t) = integral from - infinity to + infinity A(k) eikx dk

The Attempt at a Solution



integral from - infinity to + infinity of
N/(k2+a2) * eikx dk

is this a good approach? How can I solve the integral?

any help would be greatly appreciated

thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Felicity said:

Homework Statement



this problem is from (chapter 2 problem 1, gasiorowicz, quantum physics) where I am given
A(k) = N/(k2+a2) and must calculate psi(x)


Homework Equations



I am using the equation
psi(x,t) = integral from - infinity to + infinity A(k) ei(kx-wt) dk

which when t=0 goes to

psi(x,t) = integral from - infinity to + infinity A(k) eikx dk

The Attempt at a Solution



integral from - infinity to + infinity of
N/(k2+a2) * eikx dk

is this a good approach? How can I solve the integral?

any help would be greatly appreciated

thank you

yes it is the right approach.
just write
k2 + a2 as (k+ia)(k-ia)
and then do the integral in the complex k plane, closing above the real k axis so that eikx goes to zero and use the residue theorem
 
Thank you so much! would the residue then be e-ax/2ai ?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top