How to Calculate Spacing for Bridge Expansion with Linear Expansion Coefficient

  • Thread starter Thread starter DrMcDreamy
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the spacing needed for bridge expansion due to temperature increase, the formula ΔL = L₀αΔT is used, where L₀ is the original length, α is the linear expansion coefficient, and ΔT is the change in temperature. For a bridge segment of 76 m and a linear expansion coefficient of 1.2 × 10−5(°C)−1, an increase of 69°F (approximately 20.5°C) results in a calculated expansion of 0.0348 m. The final answer, converted to centimeters, is 3.48 cm. The initial confusion arose from not recognizing the required units for the answer. Proper unit conversion is crucial in such calculations.
DrMcDreamy
Messages
68
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A bridge is made with segments of concrete 76 m long (at the original temperature). If the linear expansion coefficient is 1.2 × 10−5(◦C)−1, how much spacing is needed to allow for expansion for an increase in temperature of 69◦F? Answer in units of cm.

Homework Equations



I don't know, we never did this in lecture, so I lost as to what to do.

The Attempt at a Solution



What formula am I supposed to use?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DrMcDreamy said:

Homework Statement



A bridge is made with segments of concrete 76 m long (at the original temperature). If the linear expansion coefficient is 1.2 × 10−5(◦C)−1, how much spacing is needed to allow for expansion for an increase in temperature of 69◦F? Answer in units of cm.

Homework Equations



I don't know, we never did this in lecture, so I lost as to what to do.

The Attempt at a Solution



What formula am I supposed to use?
For a formula check
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/thexp.html
 
Thank you!

So it would be:

\DeltaL=Lo\alpha\DeltaT

\DeltaL= (76 m)(1.2 x 10-5)(◦C)-1(20.5◦C+17.7◦C)

\DeltaL=0.0348 m
 
^It came out to be wrong, so what did I do wrong?
 
DrMcDreamy said:
Answer in units of cm.
ΔL=0.0348 m
That's what's wrong.
 
Oh $h*t! 3.48 cm crap I didnt even realize it had asked in cm!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top