How to calculate the charge density in an electric field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of charge density in an electric field, specifically addressing a confusion regarding the relationship between charge density ρ, electric field E, and potential Φ. The equation ρ/ε = ∇·E = -∇²Φ is highlighted, with a focus on the electrostatic potential of a point charge, which should theoretically yield a charge density of zero except at the origin. However, a miscalculation using the potential led to a non-zero result for charge density. The correct expression for the potential should be in the form Φ = Q/(4πεr), which resolves the discrepancy. This emphasizes the importance of using the correct potential equation in calculations involving electric fields.
eschavez6
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I've been studying electric fields in class for some time and one thing is seemingly contradictory and really confuses me.

The charge density ρ is related to the electric field E and the permiativity ε and the potential \Phi by the following equation

ρ/ε=∇\cdotE=-∇2\Phi

if we examine the electric field created by a single point charge of magnitude q located at the origin, then the electrostatic potential can be expressed as follows

\Phi=\frac{q}{4πε(x^2+y^2+z^2)}

now I would expect the charge density in this system to be zero everywhere except the origin but if we take the laplacean of this electric field, instead we get

ρ/ε=-∇2\Phi=\frac{2q}{4πε(x^2+y^2+z^2)^2}

which is clearly non-zero.

is there an explanation for this discrepancy? Have I violated some fundamental assumption?

thanks in advance
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well you didn't really post your work so it's hard to tell where you went wrong. The Coulomb potential is much more elegantly expressed (and easier to work with) in spherical coordinates. ##\varphi = \frac{Q}{4\pi \epsilon_0 }\frac{1}{r}## hence ## \nabla^{2}\varphi = \frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\frac{1}{r^{2}}\partial_{r}(r^{2}\partial_{r}\frac{1}{r}) = 0## for ##r \neq 0##.
 
The potential goes like 1/r and not 1/r^2.
Try the correct form of the potential. It works even in Cartesian coordinates even though is more work.
 
thanks

it seems like i was using the wrong equation for electric potential. i had an r2 in the denominator instead of just r
 
Thread 'Inducing EMF Through a Coil: Understanding Flux'
Thank you for reading my post. I can understand why a change in magnetic flux through a conducting surface would induce an emf, but how does this work when inducing an emf through a coil? How does the flux through the empty space between the wires have an effect on the electrons in the wire itself? In the image below is a coil with a magnetic field going through the space between the wires but not necessarily through the wires themselves. Thank you.
I was using the Smith chart to determine the input impedance of a transmission line that has a reflection from the load. One can do this if one knows the characteristic impedance Zo, the degree of mismatch of the load ZL and the length of the transmission line in wavelengths. However, my question is: Consider the input impedance of a wave which appears back at the source after reflection from the load and has traveled for some fraction of a wavelength. The impedance of this wave as it...

Similar threads

Back
Top