How to Calculate the Maximum Energy of Ejected Electrons?

Panic Attack
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is the maximum energy of the ejected electrons? When the radiation wavelength is 100 nm, and the stopping potential of the metal is 8.


Homework Equations


KE = hc/wavelenght - Wo


The Attempt at a Solution


I found the work function and the cut off wavelength to be the following but I can't figure out the max energy...

KE = hc/wavelenght - Wo

Wo = work function = { (6.63 *10^-34)(3*10^8) / (100 *10^9) } - (1.6*10^-19)(8)
Fo = cut off frequency = Wo / (6.63 *10^-34)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I have an answer, but I don't know if it is right...

E = Wo + KE, where Wo = 1.225*10^-19, in which I solved for
E = hc/lambda = 6.62*10^-34 * 3*10^8 / 150*10^-19 = 1.324*10^-18

E = Wo + KE
1.324*10^-18 = 1.225*10^-19 + KE

KE = 1.2015*10^-19?

Can someone tell me if this is right?
 
If it is not too late...

The max k.e. should be 8 eV
 
john54 said:
If it is not too late...

The max k.e. should be 8 eV

It's never too late. I think I got this problem wrong then. Can you explain how you got 8?
 
Panic Attack said:
KE = hc/wavelenght - Wo
You are given wavelength and Wo in the problem statement, and are asked to calculate KE. You seem to be over-complicating things. (The answer is not 8 eV, by the way.)
 
Redbelly98 said:
You are given wavelength and Wo in the problem statement, and are asked to calculate KE. You seem to be over-complicating things. (The answer is not 8 eV, by the way.)

teheheh... I got it right den... :)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top