How to Calculate Time and Angular Acceleration of a Slowing Disc

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the time and angular acceleration of a disc slowing from 1.5 rad/sec to a stop after 44 revolutions, use the equations for angular motion. The final angular velocity (V) is 0, the initial angular velocity (U) is 1.5 rad/sec, and the angular displacement (s) is 44 revolutions converted to radians (88π). Apply the equation V = U + ft to find the angular acceleration (f), and then use V² = U² + 2fs to determine the time (t) required to come to rest. The mass and radius of the disc are irrelevant for this problem since angular acceleration is constant. Understanding these calculations is essential for solving similar problems in physics.
WestCoast
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The mass of the disc is M and the radius is R. The problem states:

A disc completes 44 revolutions as it slows from an angular speed of 1.5 rad/sec to a complete stop.

1)W/ acceleration constant, what times is required for it to come to rest?

2) what is the angular acceleration?

3)how much time is required to complete the first half of the 44 revolutions?

This was an in class problem to a intro level class @ college . the teach said we should know how to do this, does anyone know where to get started? I was absent on this day... :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Angular Acceleration is constant (given).
So you can use:

V2=us+2fs...1
With v,u being angular velocity , f angular acceleration, s angular displacement.
Also

v = u + ft.....2

You are given
V = 0, s = 44 x 2 x pi radians, f = ?, U = 1.5 radiant per second

Use equation 2 above to determine f and then equation 1 to find t.

Leave it to you to do part iii.

So far as I can see the mass and radius are a distraction in this as it is constant angular acceleration. It may be that the teacher will lead on to other problems involving the moment of inertia which is calculated from these values.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top