How to Calculate Wavefunction for Arbitrary Time?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jimmycricket
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wavefunction
jimmycricket
Messages
115
Reaction score
2
For a particle, given the normalised eigenfunctions of the Hamiltonian, the associated energy eigenfunctions and the wavefunction describing the state of the particle at time t=0 how does one calculate the wavefunction for arbitrary t? I know you could solve the time dependent Schroedinger equation but is there not an easier way than that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Each eigenstate of the Hamiltonian evolves independently and the evolution is trivially given by the time-dependent SE (if you know the eigenvalue, it becomes a very simple equation for the coefficient).
 
  • Like
Likes jimmycricket
Expand the initial wave function as a linear combination of the energy eigenfunctions ##\psi_k(x)##, that is, find the coefficients ##c_k## in $$\Psi(x,0) = \sum_{k=0}^\infty c_k \psi_k(x)$$ The initial wave function then evolves as $$\Psi(x,t) = \sum_{k=0}^\infty c_k \psi_k(x) e^{-iE_k t / \hbar}$$
 
  • Like
Likes jimmycricket
Thanks for the quick replies. I'm seriously lacking an understanding of this. Can you tell me what the coefficient c_k corresponds to?
 
is it correct that c_k=\left\langle \psi_n |\psi \right\rangle
 
Only if n = k.
 
  • Like
Likes jimmycricket
silly typo there. thanks
 
Orodruin said:
Each eigenstate of the Hamiltonian evolves independently and the evolution is trivially given by the time-dependent SE (if you know the eigenvalue, it becomes a very simple equation for the coefficient).
Provided that the potential is not also a function of time, right? Of course that will be the case for a very large number of very important problems.
 
  • Like
Likes jimmycricket
Nugatory said:
Provided that the potential is not also a function of time, right? Of course that will be the case for a very large number of very important problems.

You are right of course, but based on the OP I would say we are dealing with a level where this is the case. It is also true in the adiabatic limit (where the Et in jt's post becomes an integral of E over time).
 
  • Like
Likes jimmycricket
  • #10
So say If I'm given for example \psi_n=\sqrt{\frac{2}{L}}sin(\frac{n\pi x}{L}) what will \left\langle \psi_n |\psi \right\rangle be?
Is it the same as \left\langle \psi_n |\psi_n \right\rangle
=\frac{2}{L}\int sin^2(\frac{n\pi x}{L})dx

Im not sure if this is turning into a homework help style question or not so please say if I should repost this elsewhere.
 
  • #11
oops think that last post is wrong as <br /> \left\langle \psi_n |\psi_n \right\rangle=1 since the wavefunction is normalized
 
  • #12
$$
c_n = \langle \psi_n | \Psi \rangle = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \psi_n^*(x) \Psi(x) dx
$$
 
  • Like
Likes jimmycricket

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
31
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
31
Views
3K
Back
Top