How to calculate Young's Modulus for flat spring

AI Thread Summary
To calculate Young's modulus for a flat spring, one can apply the principles of cantilever beam deflection. The user initially inquired about the appropriate method for their specific setup, where a force is applied to bend the spring. Chet suggested looking into deflections of cantilever beams, which proved helpful. The user also discovered that Euler–Bernoulli beam theory is relevant for their calculations. Understanding these concepts is essential for accurately determining Young's modulus in this context.
benedict1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I have a question regarding calculating Young's modulus for a flat spring. I have a flat spring shown as the left one in the image. Now I fix the bottom of the spring and exert a force F on top of it and it bends for distance of d. Is there any way to calculate young's modulus for this spring? I searched online and found a method called Three point flexural test , but looks different from my case. Thank you.

a.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look up deflections of cantilever beams.

Chet
 
Chestermiller said:
Look up deflections of cantilever beams.

Chet

Thank you Chet, your answer solves my problem. Many thanks.

I also found Euler–Bernoulli beam theory, which is also very useful.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top