MHB How to compute the energy needed to compress the water isothermally?

  • Thread starter Thread starter WMDhamnekar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Water
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the energy required to compress water isothermally, with an initial answer of 29.4 Joules being questioned. The expert's calculations suggest that the energy needed is significantly higher, around 506 Joules, based on constant pressure assumptions. However, it is noted that pressure builds from 1 to 100 atmospheres, indicating the actual energy requirement would be approximately half of that estimate, around 229 Joules. The temperature of the water at 20°C is relevant, as the isothermal compressibility coefficient is acknowledged to align with the calculations. Ultimately, the initial answer of 29.4 Joules appears to be incorrect based on the provided analysis.
WMDhamnekar
MHB
Messages
376
Reaction score
28
Hi,
Answer given is $E_n=29.4 Joules$ Here is the question.

1602942344841.png


Answer provided by the Chemistry math expert/Professor is as follows but it is different from the answer given. How is that?

Compressibility is the fractional change in volume per unit increase in pressure. For each atmosphere increase in pressure, the volume of water would decrease 46.4 parts per million.
I'll pick a shape for the device, calculate distance traveled and force required, and use $work = force \times distance.$
with 100 atm, volume would decrease by 4640 PPM or by a factor of 0.00464

10 kg of water is about 10 liters or $0.01 m^3$

$100 atm = 1.013e7 Pa$ or $1.013e7 N/m^2$
assume a cube shape, height is $\sqrt[3]{0.01 m^3} = 0.2154435 m$ and base area is$ 0.0464159 m^2$ (coincidence that "464" appears as two different values)
force on piston is $1.013e7 N/m^2 \times 0.0464 m^2 = 470000 N$
that change in volume causes what change in height

new volume $= 0.01 m^3 – 0.01 m^3(0.00464) = 0.00995 m^3$

which has a height of $\frac{0.00995 m^3}{0.0464159 m^2} = 0.2143663 ,$

change is 0.2154435 – 0.2143663 = 0.00108 m
energy = Fd = (470000 N)(0.00108 m) = 506 JIs temperature of water $20^\circ C$ to be considered?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Dhamnekar Winod said:
Answer given is $E_n=29.4 Joules$ Here is the question.

Answer provided by the Chemistry math expert/Professor is as follows but it is different from the answer given. How is that?
(snip)
force on piston is $1.013e7 N/m^2 \times 0.0464 m^2 = 470000 N$
that change in volume causes what change in height
new volume $= 0.01 m^3 – 0.01 m^3(0.00464) = 0.00995 m^3$
which has a height of $\frac{0.00995 m^3}{0.0464159 m^2} = 0.2143663 ,$
change is 0.2154435 – 0.2143663 = 0.00108 m

energy = Fd = (470000 N)(0.00108 m) = 506 J
Your expert's answer assumes that the force/pressure is constant at 100 atmosphere, but that is not the case.
Instead it will build up from 1 atmosphere up to 100 atmosphere.
So we can expect the actual answer to be about half of that $506\,J$, which is really an upper estimate.

I found $229\,J$ myself while taking the changing pressure into account with Calculus, which is indeed in the neighborhood of half of that $506\,J$.
Either way, it looks as if the answer of $29.4\,J$ is not correct.

Is temperature of water $20^\circ C$ to be considered?

We take the coefficient of isothermal compressibility of water at $20^\circ C$.
Wikipedia mentions that it is $4.4$ to $5.1×10^{-10}\, Pa^{-1}$ in ordinary conditions.
Close enough to that 46.4 parts per million that you mentioned.
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K