How to construct a graph with girth = twice the diameter + 1

Terrell
Messages
316
Reaction score
26

Homework Statement


I am trying to verify this theorem for myself.
Theorem: Every graph G containing a cycle satisfies g(G)≤2diam(G)+1

Homework Equations


N/A

The Attempt at a Solution


i have drawn graphs and i failed to verify the theorem. is it even possible, since increasing the girth directly increases the diameter of the graph...?

However the theorem has a proof.

Proof: Let C be a shortest cycle in G. If g(G)>= 2diam(G) + 2, then C has two vertices whose distance in C is at least diam(G)+1. In G, these vertices have a lesser distance; any shortest path P between them is therefore not a subgraph of C. Thus, P contains a C-path xPy. Together with the shorter of the two x-y paths in C, this path xPy forms a shorter cycle than C, a contradiction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This seems kind of obvious.

Let the maximum eccentricity (diameter) be ## D## and the length of the shortest cycle be ## L##. Assume, for a contradiction, a finite graph ## G## is picked such that ##L>2D+1 ##. Then the graph ## G## contains two vertices with a distance of at least ##2D+1 ##, an immediate contradiction. Do you understand what the contradiction is?
 
nuuskur said:
This seems kind of obvious.

Let the maximal eccentricity (diameter) be ## D## and the length of the shortest cycle be ## L##. Assume, for a contradiction, a finite graph ## G## is picked such that ##L>2D+1 ##. Then the graph ## G## contains two vertices with a distance of at least ##2D+1 ##, an immediate contradiction. Do you understand what the contradiction is?
sorry for that, my book did not define diameter correctly which lead to my confusion.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
14K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top