How to Convert 4-Methylpentanoic Acid to 4-Methyl-2-Bromopentanoic Acid?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Oblivion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Organic Synthesis
AI Thread Summary
To convert 4-methylpentanoic acid to 4-methyl-2-bromopentanoic acid, one suggested method involves treating the acid with bromine and UV light, targeting the carbon with the least hydrogen atoms for bromination. This approach is based on the principle that the carbon with fewer hydrogens will react more readily. The discussion indicates that this is a second-semester organic chemistry topic, implying a foundational understanding of reaction mechanisms. Further exploration of camphor synthesis may provide additional insights into similar reactions. Overall, the conversion process hinges on selective bromination techniques.
Oblivion
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hey, I'm trying to figure out how to convert 4-methylpentanoic acid into 4-methyl-2-bromopentanoic acid and I'm stuck. It's second semester O-chem for reference. Any ideas? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
this is probably wrong but simply treat with bromine and UV light? its the carbon with the least number of H on it so itll lose it more easily than the others.
 
Camphor synthesis
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

Chemistry How to take into account autoprotolysis in weak base solution?
Replies
8
Views
2K
Chemistry Comparing methods of computing pH at equivalence point in titration
Replies
4
Views
1K
Question about acid and base indicators
Replies
7
Views
7K
What will be the product of this organic reaction?
Replies
28
Views
5K
Chemistry How do you calculate moles to neutralise oxalic acid?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Chemistry How Does Methyl Orange's Color Intensity Vary on Cotton, Nylon, and Wool?
Replies
1
Views
3K
with "Triprotic Acid Titration" Question
Replies
4
Views
4K
Can Methane and Citric Acid be Balanced in a Redox Reaction?
Replies
3
Views
2K
Methyl 2 hydroxybenzoate hydrogen bonding
Replies
2
Views
2K
Chemistry How do we interpret the steps in the algorithm to balance a redox equation?
Replies
7
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top