How to convert cm^-1 into erg or joules

  • Thread starter Thread starter AutisticAlien
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convert Joules
AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses the conversion of cm^-1 into energy units like erg or joules, clarifying that cm^-1 is not a direct unit of energy. It explains that cm^-1 can relate to the energy of photons, specifically referencing a photon with a wavelength of 1 cm, which equates to approximately 1.99 x 10^(-23) joules. The conversation also highlights the importance of context, as the original inquiry stemmed from a chemistry problem involving crystal fields. Ultimately, the participants confirm that while cm^-1 cannot be converted directly to energy, it can be associated with photon energy calculations. Understanding these relationships is crucial for solving related chemistry problems.
AutisticAlien
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I'm not sure if this is the right place for this, but I can't seem to find how to convert cm^-1 into erg or joules... It's a pretty dumb question, but I can't find the answer anywhere.

Thanks a lot in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You cant, because cm^(-1) is not a unit of energy. The base units of energy are m l t^(-2). For example Ergs are grams cm seconds^(-2) and Joules are kg m seconds^(-2).
 


The only meaning that I can think of for that is perhaps comparing the energy to that of a photon of wavelength one cm.

For example, a photon of wavelength 1mm would have an energy of 10 cm^(-1) and so on.

In that case the conversion factor would just be the energy of a photon wavelength 1cm, which is 100 h c, or about 1.99 x 10^(-23) Joules.

In what context did you see this unit used Alien?
 


Failed to mention context, sorry. But yes, it was the way you predicted. Thank you very much!

It was a Chemistry problem about crystal fields.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top