How to correctly find total drag?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rcummings89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drag
AI Thread Summary
The total drag force on a car cannot be simply calculated by summing the drag forces of individual components like a spoiler or hood scoop, as the drag coefficients of complex shapes do not behave linearly. Each component's drag is influenced by the airflow created by the others, making it impossible to accurately determine total drag without experimental data or computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. While rough estimates can be made to gauge whether a modification might significantly impact fuel efficiency, these should be followed by proper testing for accuracy. The interaction of airflow around the vehicle complicates the calculation, as the conditions experienced by each part change when they are combined. Ultimately, empirical testing remains the most reliable method for assessing the impact of aerodynamic changes.
rcummings89
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I just want to make sure I am doing this right. As an example, if I want to add a spoiler or hood scoop to a car, after I find the correct coefficients of drag, can I assume that the total drag force acting on the car is ƩFD=drag of the car + drag of the spoiler+ drag of scoop, etc.?

And following that logic, when I want to find the total drag force, rather than calculating out all of the individual forces, can I correctly say that FD = 0.5(ρv2A)(ƩCD) ?

Thanks in advance,
Rob
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rcummings89 said:
Hello,

I just want to make sure I am doing this right. As an example, if I want to add a spoiler or hood scoop to a car, after I find the correct coefficients of drag, can I assume that the total drag force acting on the car is ƩFD=drag of the car + drag of the spoiler+ drag of scoop, etc.?

And following that logic, when I want to find the total drag force, rather than calculating out all of the individual forces, can I correctly say that FD = 0.5(ρv2A)(ƩCD) ?

Thanks in advance,
Rob
This does not work at all, unfortunately. The drag coefficient of a complicated shape made of several parts is neither the sum of the drag coefficients of the individual parts, nor the average, nor the area-weighted average.

It is true that the drag force on the car will be equal to the drag on the body plus the drag on the spoiler. However, this is of no use in calculating the total drag, because you cannot use the coefficient of drag for the body-without-spoiler to calculate the drag force on the body-with-spoiler, and similarly you can't use the coefficient of drag for the spoiler alone to calculate the drag force on the spoiler once it is attached to the body.

Determining the coefficient of drag of an object as complicated as a car pretty much requires an experiment or a computer model.
 
Thanks eigenperson, I had a feeling it was too easy lol. Ok, so much for that. Let me just ask you this then: if I want to see if a spoiler would increase the drag enough to cause a significant decrease in MPG, and I just want to know right away if it's even worth the effort (a back-of-the-envelope kind of calculation), could I just sum the forces? And if the drag is significant disregard the idea, and if my rough estimate says it's insignificant, then do an experiment...?
 
Which forces are you trying to sum? Generally speaking, drag forces do not obey superposition because nothing in the process is a linear phenomenon. The only way to know for sure would be to run a CFD simulation or an experiment of some kind, e.g. a wind tunnel model or just put a spoiler on your car and drive around and comparpe it to your mileage before adding the spoiler, though that would be difficult to control properly.
 
The problem is that the airflow of one part affects another. For example you could calculate the separate drag forces on

A car at 70mph
A roof bar at 70mph

But you can't just add them. The airflow over the roof of a car doing 70 is likely to be faster than 70 because it speeds up as it goes up over the car.
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Drag Coefficient of a 'flexible' object (e.g. a piece of paper)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Power required to reach X velocity in X time with drag
Replies
10
Views
2K
Help with drag coefficient calculated from ballistic coefficient
Replies
3
Views
7K
Relationship between Drag Force & Viscous Torque on USA Football
Replies
6
Views
1K
How increased mass and drag affect speed
Replies
1
Views
2K
Final Velocity of a car with a opposing decreasing drag force
2
Replies
57
Views
2K
I Drag equation - relative flow velocity
Replies
11
Views
3K
How to calculate Drag Coefficient?
Replies
26
Views
13K
Where do I find coefficient values for these 2 formulas? (drag coefficients)
Replies
9
Views
2K
Air drag force: Why heavy objects accelerate faster?
Replies
2
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top