How to correctly find total drag?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rcummings89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drag
AI Thread Summary
The total drag force on a car cannot be simply calculated by summing the drag forces of individual components like a spoiler or hood scoop, as the drag coefficients of complex shapes do not behave linearly. Each component's drag is influenced by the airflow created by the others, making it impossible to accurately determine total drag without experimental data or computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. While rough estimates can be made to gauge whether a modification might significantly impact fuel efficiency, these should be followed by proper testing for accuracy. The interaction of airflow around the vehicle complicates the calculation, as the conditions experienced by each part change when they are combined. Ultimately, empirical testing remains the most reliable method for assessing the impact of aerodynamic changes.
rcummings89
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I just want to make sure I am doing this right. As an example, if I want to add a spoiler or hood scoop to a car, after I find the correct coefficients of drag, can I assume that the total drag force acting on the car is ƩFD=drag of the car + drag of the spoiler+ drag of scoop, etc.?

And following that logic, when I want to find the total drag force, rather than calculating out all of the individual forces, can I correctly say that FD = 0.5(ρv2A)(ƩCD) ?

Thanks in advance,
Rob
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rcummings89 said:
Hello,

I just want to make sure I am doing this right. As an example, if I want to add a spoiler or hood scoop to a car, after I find the correct coefficients of drag, can I assume that the total drag force acting on the car is ƩFD=drag of the car + drag of the spoiler+ drag of scoop, etc.?

And following that logic, when I want to find the total drag force, rather than calculating out all of the individual forces, can I correctly say that FD = 0.5(ρv2A)(ƩCD) ?

Thanks in advance,
Rob
This does not work at all, unfortunately. The drag coefficient of a complicated shape made of several parts is neither the sum of the drag coefficients of the individual parts, nor the average, nor the area-weighted average.

It is true that the drag force on the car will be equal to the drag on the body plus the drag on the spoiler. However, this is of no use in calculating the total drag, because you cannot use the coefficient of drag for the body-without-spoiler to calculate the drag force on the body-with-spoiler, and similarly you can't use the coefficient of drag for the spoiler alone to calculate the drag force on the spoiler once it is attached to the body.

Determining the coefficient of drag of an object as complicated as a car pretty much requires an experiment or a computer model.
 
Thanks eigenperson, I had a feeling it was too easy lol. Ok, so much for that. Let me just ask you this then: if I want to see if a spoiler would increase the drag enough to cause a significant decrease in MPG, and I just want to know right away if it's even worth the effort (a back-of-the-envelope kind of calculation), could I just sum the forces? And if the drag is significant disregard the idea, and if my rough estimate says it's insignificant, then do an experiment...?
 
Which forces are you trying to sum? Generally speaking, drag forces do not obey superposition because nothing in the process is a linear phenomenon. The only way to know for sure would be to run a CFD simulation or an experiment of some kind, e.g. a wind tunnel model or just put a spoiler on your car and drive around and comparpe it to your mileage before adding the spoiler, though that would be difficult to control properly.
 
The problem is that the airflow of one part affects another. For example you could calculate the separate drag forces on

A car at 70mph
A roof bar at 70mph

But you can't just add them. The airflow over the roof of a car doing 70 is likely to be faster than 70 because it speeds up as it goes up over the car.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top