How to deal with drones snooping on you

  • Thread starter Thread starter jtbell
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drones
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the use of drones, particularly in relation to wildlife and military applications. Participants express a fascination with the idea of birds, like hawks, defending their territory against drones, highlighting the ongoing competition between nature and technology. The conversation touches on the definition of drones, clarifying that they are unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) that can range from military units to consumer quadcopters. There's speculation about how birds perceive drones, whether as prey or competition. The impact of drone technology on businesses, such as Amazon's delivery plans, is also considered. Additionally, there are humorous remarks about the evolution of the term "drone" and its association with military use, as well as personal anecdotes about flying remote-controlled aircraft. The legality of drone usage is questioned, suggesting concerns about regulation and safety.
jtbell
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
16,023
Reaction score
7,534
Deploy a biotic anti-drone missile:

 
  • Like
Likes Astronuc, Drakkith, Medicol and 1 other person
Physics news on Phys.org
Awesome. I liked the sound of the drone motors trying to recover attitude.
 
  • Like
Likes Medicol
For some reason part of me really likes that, for the time being at least, the birds are still the true masters of the skies, at least when it comes to being to objects that size. They can't do anything about our aeroplanes and helicopters, but they can still put up a fight against drones encroaching on their territory!

Although soon they'll lose that battle too...
 
Take your rifle, lock and load!
 
nuuskur said:
Take your rifle, lock and load!

That's what I will do next time I see a drone.
 
Better to pull an Iran and use cyberwarfare to steal the drone for personal use, or at least ransom.
 
I wonder if the hawk thinks it's prey or competition.
 
I thought drones were the things the military uses to attack targets remotely. Isn't that thing just a quadcopter with a camera?
 
leroyjenkens said:
I thought drones were the things the military uses to attack targets remotely. Isn't that thing just a quadcopter with a camera?
I believe to be called a "drone" all that is necessary is that it have no onboard pilot. They are most often used for surveillance, but can be outfitted to explode on crashing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unmanned_aerial_vehicle
 
  • #10
Didn't expect a Bird of Prey to Cling-On. :D

Lame Trek pun, I know.
 
  • #11
He was just mad the drone got in his territory and tried to kill it
 
  • #12
http://dilbert.com/dyn/str_strip/000000000/00000000/0000000/000000/40000/0000/000/40023/40023.strip.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #13
leroyjenkens said:
I thought drones were the things the military uses to attack targets remotely. Isn't that thing just a quadcopter with a camera?

As I understand things "drone" is essentially a colloquialism for UAV and a UAV is simply an aerial vehicle with no human pilot. So that can include everything from (mostly) autonomous military units to model aircraft. In my experience though when people say "drone" they mean something that is capable of some form of autonomous flight. In the case of quadcopters you can buy some types that essentially fly themselves with a human pilot telling them simple instructions (up/down/look over there/come back). This sounds similar to a model airplane but if you've ever flown one of the latter you'd definitely know the difference between giving instructions and remote piloting :) I've only done it once but it didn't end well...
 
  • #14
zoobyshoe said:
I wonder if the hawk thinks it's prey or competition.
I'm going to go with competition.

To see it as prey, I'd think the bird would have to recognize it. i.e. new things are not prey unless they are prey.
To see it as competition, the bird only has to recognize it as a threat i.e. new things are competition unless they are not competition.Also, I'd expect that, if it thought it was prey, it would take up a position above the target to observe and attack from cover.
 
Last edited:
  • #15
It's probably just a previously undiscovered species of Kardashian who thought that the drone was being controlled by paparazzi.
 
  • #16
It makes me wonder how this will affect Amazon's business plan for drone deliveries.
 
  • #17
Borg said:
It makes me wonder how this will affect Amazon's business plan for drone deliveries.
Warning: A little foul language and a bit graphic, but ... cool, IMO.

 
  • Like
Likes Borg
  • #18
Not quite as violent but a nice idea.

 
  • Like
Likes dlgoff
  • #19
Ryan_m_b said:
As I understand things "drone" is essentially a colloquialism for UAV and a UAV is simply an aerial vehicle with no human pilot. So that can include everything from (mostly) autonomous military units to model aircraft. In my experience though when people say "drone" they mean something that is capable of some form of autonomous flight. In the case of quadcopters you can buy some types that essentially fly themselves with a human pilot telling them simple instructions (up/down/look over there/come back). This sounds similar to a model airplane but if you've ever flown one of the latter you'd definitely know the difference between giving instructions and remote piloting :) I've only done it once but it didn't end well...
Seems like people only started calling them drones after the military started using them and calling them drones. I guess it just sounds cooler. And that's probably why people started buying hummers. Then gas prices went up and I stopped seeing hummers on the road.

I had an RC plane once. I remember when I first flew it. That was also the last time I flew it. Or, rather, it was the last time it could fly.
 
  • #20
dlgoff said:
Warning: A little foul language and a bit graphic, but ... cool, IMO.


How the hell is this stuff legal??
 
Back
Top