How to deal with unusual factor-group?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tuu-tikki
  • Start date Start date
tuu-tikki
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let symmetry group SU(3) be broken by two Higgs fields in adjoint representation, so as SU(3) is transitive on vacuum manifold M, and the fields in one of vacuums are diagonal:
v_1 \cdot diag(1,1,-2); v_1 \cdot diag(1,-1,0). Find the homotopy groups of vacuum manifold \pi_2 (M); \pi_1 (M).

Homework Equations



Theorem. M=G/H, if action G is transitive on M, H - stationary subgroup. Stationary subgroup consists of all the elements h\in G which don't change the element of M: F(h) m = m, m\in M. There also is a theorem that the resulting subgroup H doesn't depend on the chosen element m.

The Attempt at a Solution



So, to use the theorem, we have to find stationary subgroup H, and the manifold M would be isomorphic to SU(3)/H. One element of M (we'll call it m) is given right in the problem statement. So, we should find all h that F(h) m = m. The fields do transform on the adjoint representation of SU(3), so it is h m h^{-1} = m which leads us to equation [h,m]=0, [,] is commutator. For the given in the problem statement vacuum m (two expressions for fields) one can find two constraints on all the elements h. In addition to this, elements h \in H are subgroups of SU(3), so, if we take it into account, we'll get such an expression for subgroup H:
\begin{pmatrix}<br /> e^{i\phi} &amp; 0 &amp;0 \\ <br /> 0 &amp; e^{i\psi}&amp; 0\\ <br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; e^{-i\phi-i\psi}<br /> \end{pmatrix}

It seems to me that group of such matrices is isomorphic to U(1)xU(1). So, the desired manifold is M= SU(3)/(U(1)xU(1)). Firstly, I want to ask about some site or book where many of the relations using the factor groups are gathered (like SU(2)/Z_2 = SO(3)). They really make life easier sometimes; and, in particular, I want to know if SU(3)/(U(1)xU(1) is isomorphic to some more simple-written group. Moreover, I completely don't understand how to find homotopy groups like \pi_2 (SU(3)/(U(1)xU(1))). Give an idea, please. Probably SU(3)/(U(1)xU(1)) is homotopically equivalent to something easy?

Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The solution.

I found the answer to it by myself.
There's such a theorem that if there is a bundle (G, G/H, H), G is compact and simply-connected then \pi_2 (G/H) = \pi_1 (H). Also if G is connected, \pi_1 (G/H) = \pi_0 (H). So, the desired homotopy classes are \pi_2 (SU(3)/(U(1)\times U(1))) = \pi_1 (U(1) \times U(1)) = \pi_1 (U(1)) \times \pi_1 (U(1)) = Z \times Z ; \pi_1 (SU(3)/(U(1)\times U(1))) = \pi_0 (U(1) \times U(1)) = 0.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top