How to define the Hamiltonian phase space for system?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around defining the Hamiltonian phase space for different physical systems, specifically comparing the phase space of a free particle with that of a harmonic oscillator. Participants explore the implications of the definitions and the nature of the variables involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the definition of phase space for a free particle versus a harmonic oscillator, noting that the former is described as {(q, p) ϵ ℝ²} while the latter is simply {(q, p)}.
  • Another participant questions why the phase-space variables for the harmonic oscillator can take any real value, suggesting that there should be no restrictions.
  • A participant seeks clarification on why the phase of the free particle is described as taking any squared real value.
  • One participant explains that the phase space in Hamiltonian mechanics is defined by generalized coordinates and their canonical momenta, using the harmonic oscillator as an example to illustrate that both q and p can take any real values.
  • A later reply clarifies that the notation ℝ² refers to ordered pairs of real numbers, indicating that (q, p) ∈ ℝ² means points in phase space are pairs of real numbers, not squared values.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of phase space definitions, with some confusion remaining about the terminology and implications for different systems. No consensus is reached on the definitions or the nature of the variables involved.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the definitions of phase space and the implications of the notation used. Participants have not fully clarified the distinctions between the phase spaces of different systems.

Lengalicious
Messages
162
Reaction score
0
Title says it all, confused as to how I'm supposed to define the phase space of a system, in my lecture notes I have the phase space as {(q, p) ϵ ℝ2} for a 1 dimensional free particle but then for a harmonic oscillator its defined as {(q, p)}, why is the free particles phase space all squared real numbers?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Also for the harmonic oscillator the phase-space variables can take any real value. Why shouldn't it?
 
Ok but why does the phase of the free particle take any squared real value?
 
I do not know what you mean by this question.

The phase space in Hamiltonian mechanics is spanned by the generalized coordinates and their canonical momenta. Let's take the harmonic oscillator in one dimension as an example.

Usually you start with the Lagrangian:
L=\frac{m}{2} \dot{q}^2-\frac{m \omega^2}{2} q^2.
The canonical momentum is
p=\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}}=m \dot{q}.
The Hamiltonian is then given by
H(q,p)=p \dot{q}-L=\frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{m \omega^2}{2} q^2.
The possible values for q and p are all the real numbers for each of these variables since there is no singularity in the Hamiltonian for any such values. Thus the phase space for the 1D harmonic oscillator is (q,p) \in \mathbb{R}^2.
 
Lengalicious said:
Ok but why does the phase of the free particle take any squared real value?
The \mathbb{R}^2 doesn't mean squared real numbers. It means the set of order pairs of real numbers (x,y), where x and y are real numbers. So (q,p) \in \mathbb{R}^2 just means points in phase space are composed of pairs of real numbers q and p.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K