How to delay (and control) a composite video signal?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the methods and devices for delaying a composite video signal, particularly for live video feedback effects in artistic applications. Participants explore both analog and digital approaches, including the feasibility of constructing their own delay devices or utilizing existing technology.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks guidance on creating a delay device for composite video signals, expressing uncertainty about the complexity of the task.
  • Another participant suggests that digitizing the analog signal and using RAM could achieve the desired delay, questioning the necessity of using analog signals.
  • Some participants discuss the possibility of using HDMI output from a camera, noting that devices for HDMI delay may exist but could be expensive.
  • A participant mentions the potential of using a capture card and software to delay the video signal, considering the limitations of their laptop's RAM and resolution.
  • There is a suggestion to use video tape and the technique of flanging as a low-cost method for achieving delays, though this raises concerns about the complexity of implementation.
  • Participants reference historical figures like Les Paul in relation to audio techniques, discussing the challenges of reproducing color carrier frequencies in video signals.
  • One participant reports success in achieving long delays using a composite video to USB device and software, highlighting the importance of ease of use in live visual performance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the best approach to achieve video signal delays, with no consensus on a single method. Some favor digital solutions while others consider analog techniques, leading to ongoing exploration of both options.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention limitations related to the quality of analog signals, the complexity of implementing certain techniques, and the dependence on specific hardware and software capabilities.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for artists and technologists interested in video processing, live performance effects, and the technical challenges of video signal manipulation.

mister mishka
Messages
41
Reaction score
32
Hey, I want to set my own delays to a composite video signal, for use of live video feedback effects (for visuals / art purposes). I am no electrician, but this can't be hard to do right? After searching a few hours online, I haven't come up with any device that I can buy which will do this. Is there any such device / how can I make my own "delay signal" device?

All I would want control of is having 1 knob for example control the delay timings of a signal in milleseconds, with 1 composite video in and 1 composite video out of course. Can anyone guide me in the right direction?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
mister mishka said:
Hey, I want to set my own delays to a composite video signal, for use of live video feedback effects (for visuals / art purposes). I am no electrician, but this can't be hard to do right? After searching a few hours online, I haven't come up with any device that I can buy which will do this. Is there any such device / how can I make my own "delay signal" device?

All I would want control of is having 1 knob for example control the delay timings of a signal in milleseconds, with 1 composite video in and 1 composite video out of course. Can anyone guide me in the right direction?
Typically this is done by digitizing the input analog signal, writing it to RAM with one process, reading it from RAM with another process, and writing it out to a DAC to make the output analog signal.

There are certainly systems that can do this already, and you should be able to find them. The generalized ones with lots of delay capability will be expensive, though, and it sounds like you just need a simpler version.

Do you really have to work with analog composite video signals? If you can just stay in the digital domain, you will save some money and get lots better quality. What are your signal source and your display device options? And how long of a maximum delay do you want?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mister mishka
I can also use HDMI out on my Nikon camera, if I could control the delay of that signal that would be much better yes. Is it easier to construct / do devices for this exist for HDMI?

Input options to my screen are plenty, HDMI / VGA / S Video / Composite. The range of delay timings I want control of would be something from 0 - 2 seconds.
 
mister mishka said:
I can also use HDMI out on my Nikon camera, if I could control the delay of that signal that would be much better yes. Is it easier to construct / do devices for this exist for HDMI?

Input options to my screen are plenty, HDMI / VGA / S Video / Composite. The range of delay timings I want control of would be something from 0 - 2 seconds.
I Goodled HDMI Video Delay Device, and got lots of hits. Here's the hit list:

https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=hdmi video delay unit

:smile:
 
Hm, yeah I googled it a bit myself and see they are quite expensive. Given that it comes down to how much of it has to be put into ram, I can see why these things are expensive. Thats why I was hoping maybe composite video had something more simpler / cheaper, with less information to put into a buffer thus I could achieve longer delays..

I think what I might do is use a capture card, stream the video source to my computer, then find some software that can delay the signal (since I have 16 gb of ram already on my laptop, but not sure of how long of a delay I can achieve with this given a HD 1920x1080 resolution).
 
mister mishka said:
Thats why I was hoping maybe composite video had something more simpler / cheaper, with less information to put into a buffer thus I could achieve longer delays..
A really cheap way would, maybe, be by using video tape and the technique of Flanging.
i.e. from the link, adjust the record & pickup head distance
FLANGING5.PNG
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy and mister mishka
That also looks interesting, but I think it would then become a whole different project (plus I wouldn't know where to start).

I have researched it more, and what I will do is buy a cheap composite video to usb device and use VLC to delay the video signal. Tomorrow I buy this little device, costs 10 euros and then start testing it. Maybe down the line I get an HDMI capture card and do the same, while still being able to control the delay signal.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff
dlgoff said:
adjust the record & pickup head distance

Wasn't it Les Paul who added a head to his tape deck and pioneered "sound on sound" ?

I guess you'd have to reproduce the 3.58mhz color carrier? No wonder they use rotating heads.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
jim hardy said:
Wasn't it Les Paul who added a head to his tape deck and pioneered "sound on sound" ?

I guess you'd have to reproduce the 3.58mhz color carrier? No wonder they use rotating heads.
Not sure about Les Paul but yea, the color carrier would be problematic. That never occurred to me.
 
  • #10
Flanging ... learned a new word
from Don's link
Despite subsequent claims over who originated flanging, Les Paul discovered the effect in the late 1940s and 1950s; however, he did most of his early phasing experiments with acetate disks on variable-speed record players. His 1955 single "Nuevo Laredo" features phase shifting,[1] as does the 1953 single "Mammy's Boogie." [2]
 
  • #11
Since there are a lot of high (relative term I suppose) frequencies in NTSC even without the color subcarrier standard tape devices would not work. The general scheme was to frequency modulate the luminance information onto a carrier and feed this to a flying tape head. The color information was processed in some way also but exactly how escapes me right now. Even the audio in higher end VCRs was put onto the tape with the flying head. There was still always a stationary head for compatibility to lower end VCRs.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff
  • #12
Oh I have managed to work with long delays of up to 5 seconds using composite video to usb and Resolume as the effect software, and it works great! :)

The quality is more then good enough for now, while I learn the techniques of how to film by playing around with it more. I have my own midi control mappings, and can delay the signal (or each rgb signal separately) by a simple knob. The quick access / ease of use is important with this live visual filming, because it is all about timing and working the delays (to get the right looking fractal pattern). An HDMI capture card will come afterwards, when I get better with my art ^^
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
927
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
37
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K