How to Derive cos(θ) in Relativistic Elastic Collisions?

wam_mi
Messages
78
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Q: Consider two identical particles A and B have the same mass m in the inertial frame
R where B is at rest. The two particles collide and their trajectories after
impact are symmetrical with respect to the incident direction. Let t be the
angle between the trajectories after collision. Obtain an expression of cos t as
a function of the mass m and the kinetic energy T1 of the particle A.



Homework Equations



(i) Einstein Relation / Relativistic Energy Relation between energy and momentum
E^2 = (mc^2)^2 + (mod p)^2 *c^2

where E = energy
and p = momentum

(ii) Conservation of Energy: Energy before = Energy after

(iii) Conservation of Momentum: Momentum before = Momentum after

The Attempt at a Solution



Using Energy Conservation: T1 + mc^2 + mc^2 = Energy after

Using Momentum Conservation: ?

Since I do not know any velocities and I only know particle A has kinetic energy T1 and therefore total energy T1 + mc^2... I don't know how to complete this problem.

Also I try to do momentum conservation in the x-direction

so before the impact particle A would have p(x-component)

and after the impact particle A would have p1(x-component) = p1 *cos (t/2)

and after the impact particle B would have p2 (x-component) = p2 * cos(t/2)

Please help!

Thanks a lot guys
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi wam_mi! :smile:

(have a square-root: √ and try using the X2 and X2 tags just above the Reply box :wink:)
wam_mi said:
Using Energy Conservation: T1 + mc^2 + mc^2 = Energy after

Using Momentum Conservation: ?

Nooo … start again …

don't use T1 + mc2 … it's horrible and pointless …

use energy = m/√(1 - v2/c2) and momentum = mv/√(1 - v2/c2) :wink:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
31
Views
3K
Replies
41
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Back
Top