How to Derive Initial Velocity in Projectile Motion Using Lab Measurements?

J_o_S
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hi

I'm having trouble figuring this one out..based on an angular momentum lab.

In the lab we had a turntable with a ball on it, when the ball was released, the intial velocity could be calculated using the formula


v=d(g/2h)^{1/2}

I need to be able to derive the same formula

v=d(g/2h)^{1/2}

using only measureable quantites from my lab.

measure quantities are

height (ball to table top)
mass of the ball
distance between axis of rotation and ball
distance horizontal distance

I have to derive this equation using horizontal and vertical coordinates.

any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
J_o_S said:
Hi

I'm having trouble figuring this one out..based on an angular momentum lab.

In the lab we had a turntable with a ball on it, when the ball was released, the intial velocity could be calculated using the formula


v=d(g/2h)^{1/2}

I need to be able to derive the same formula

v=d(g/2h)^{1/2}

using only measureable quantites from my lab.

measure quantities are

height (ball to table top)
mass of the ball
distance between axis of rotation and ball
distance horizontal distance

I have to derive this equation using horizontal and vertical coordinates.

any ideas?

Well, it's motion with constant acceleration. You know how far it fell (vertically) so you should be able to calculate the time it took to fall. Then you know it moved horizontally with constant speed, and you know how far it went and (from the vertical equation) how long it was in the air.

-Dan
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top