How to Derive the Lagrangian for a Charged Particle in a Coulomb Potential?

vsharma88
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A charged particle of mass m and charge q is free to move in the horizontal (x, y) plane, under
the influence of the Coulomb potential due to another charge Q that is fixed at the origin.

Find the Lagrangian and the differential equations of motion of the mass m, in terms of
Cartesian coordinates (x, y).


Homework Equations



dL/dqi - d/dt * dL/dq'i = 0
L = T - V
T = .5mv^2
V= KQq/r

The Attempt at a Solution



L = T - V

Langrangian = 0.5mx'^2 - KQq/x

dL/dx - d/dt * dL/dx' = 0
d/dx(-KQq/x) - d/dt * d/dx'(0.5mv^2)=0

-dV/dt - d/dt(mx')=0
Fx = mx''

Is this the right answer? The question asks for it to be in terms of the cartesian coordinates.
However, my answer isn't. Please Help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your solution is schematically ok, if you are only working in one variable. Except you mean dV/dx, right? Now just do the same thing in two variables q1=x(t), q2=y(t). T=(1/2)mv^2=(1/2)m(x'(t)^2+y'(t)^2), V=KqQ/(x^2+y^2)^(1/2).
 
The question says that the charge can only move horizontally, so is it necessary to have the y component?
 
vsharma88 said:
The question says that the charge can only move horizontally, so is it necessary to have the y component?

You said it's constrained to move in the (x,y) plane, right? Not just along a line.
 
It says the charge is free to move in the horizontal (x,y) plane. Does that not mean it is only allowed to move horizontally?

A charged particle of mass m and charge q is free to move in the horizontal (x, y) plane, under
the influence of the Coulomb potential due to another charge Q that is fixed at the origin.
 
The entire xy plane is horizontal, the z-direction would be the vertical...think of it in terms of standing on a flat earth...you can move North, West, 22 degree East by South-East and In all of these cases you are moving in the horizontal plane...it is only if you were to jump up and down that you would be moving vertically...so yes, you need to consider both x and y in your Lagrangian
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top