How to Derive the Lorentz Transformation for the x Component of Momentum?

insynC
Messages
66
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Derive the Lorentz transformation for the x component of momentum, i.e.

Px' = \gamma (Px - vE/(c^{}2))

I've used Px = x component of momentum (not very good with latex, sorry!)

Homework Equations



I thought the best place to start was the Lorentz transformation for velocity (which was given):

ux' = [ux - v] / [1 + v ux/(c^{}2)]

The Attempt at a Solution



Applying this, I used the fact Px = \gamma m0 ux - where m0 is rest mass - and then fiddled around with it.

I was able to almost get the answer, except on the RHS I got what is required multiplied by a factor of:

1 / [ \gamma - \gamma ux v /(c^{}2) ]

Unfortunately I couldn't show this was equal to 1 and am not even convinced it is. Was the approach I took the easiest way to the answer? I've tried it again and got the same problem, so maybe there is a better way to tackle it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
insynC said:
Applying this, I used the fact Px = \gamma m0 ux - where m0 is rest mass - and then fiddled around with it.

Hi insynC! :smile:

(have a gamma: γ)

(and use the X2 tag just above the reply field: Px :wink:)

I'm not sure that you used γ's dependence on speed:

Px = γ(u)ux , Px' = γ(v)vx
 
Good point, I hadn't taken that into consideration.

I have to now introduce γ(ux') and γ(ux), but ultimately the answer has a γ(v) in it. I'm struggling to remove the excess γ's introduced to convert the velocity transform into the momentum transform.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top