How to Derive Thévenin's Equivalent Circuit from Nodes a and b?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving Thévenin's equivalent circuit from nodes a and b, with the user expressing confusion over their calculations. They correctly identified the equivalent resistance as 1.6 ohms but encountered inconsistencies between their nodal and mesh analysis results, particularly regarding the voltage at node V2. The conversation emphasizes that it's acceptable to assume one node has a higher voltage when applying nodal analysis, even if the actual voltages are unknown. Participants suggest double-checking equations for consistency and recommend redrawing the circuit for clarity. Overall, the importance of careful analysis and verification in circuit calculations is highlighted.
An1MuS
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
As seen from a and b.
tC3DW.jpg


My teacher did the norton's equivalent in the class, and now for studying purposes i was trying to get to the Thévenin's one. However it seems my equations are somehow wrong, and i can't figure out why.

The Eq resistance is 8||2, which is 1.6 ohms.

I tried to apply Nodal analysis first

WNqBl.jpg


so,
for node V1: \frac{20-V_1}{3}=\frac{V_1-V_3}{2}
for node V2: \frac{V_1-V_3}{2}=6+\frac{V_2-0}{5}=
The relationship between two voltages is also known, which is V_2=V_3+10

which gives V1=2 ; V2=0 ; V3=-10.

V1-V2 should indeed be 2, because from my teachers resolution, Vab = 2V. I don't get is how can V2 be 0? Then there can't be another voltage drop when it reaches the ground (0V)

Also, then i tried mesh analysis:
UKA3A.jpg


For mesh 120+10=3I_1+2I_1+5(I_1+I_2)
For mesh 2 0=5(I_2-I_1)+v
I_2=6

Where v is the voltage drop across the current source.

It gives I1 = 6 and v (which is equal to the V2 of the nodal analysis) = 0 again.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
My answer is that :
V2 is 0V because 6A current source short 5Ω resistor.
Also notice that (20V + 10V) / ( 3Ω + 2Ω ) = 6A

So from superposition point of view we have this situation

attachment.php?attachmentid=46116&stc=1&d=1334158488.png


V2' = 30*R2/(R1 +R2) = 15V

And

V2'' = - (6A * 5/(10)) * 5 = - 15V

and V2 = V2' + V2'' = 15 + (- 15V) = 0V
 

Attachments

  • 12.PNG
    12.PNG
    6.8 KB · Views: 527
Last edited:
Thanks :) it means the current source is just discharging current. Like i had a current source between two Earth connections.

Another question:

In nodal analysis, when calculating a current entering / leaving a node we do \frac{V_x-V_y}{R} where V_x > V_y My question is: what if we don't know which of the two nodes has higher voltage when writting the equations? Or should it always be possible to know ?
 
An1MuS said:
Another question:

In nodal analysis, when calculating a current entering / leaving a node we do \frac{V_x-V_y}{R} where V_x > V_y My question is: what if we don't know which of the two nodes has higher voltage when writting the equations? Or should it always be possible to know ?
You don't need to know which of the two nodes has higher voltage.
All you need to do is assume that one of a voltage nodes has a higher voltage than the other node. And you can treat all nodes individually and assume that the node your currently examining has higher voltage.

For example for this circuit

attachment.php?attachmentid=46151&stc=1&d=1334238395.png


We can assume Vin > Va > Vout

And we can write nodal equation

\frac{(Vin-Va)}{R1}=\frac{Va}{R3}+\frac{(Va-Vout)}{R2}

\frac{(Va-Vout)}{R2}=\frac{Vout}{R4}

Or we can assume when we examining Va node that Va has the highest voltage.
And this means that all current flow-out (leave) from the Va node.

\frac{(Va-Vin)}{R1}+\frac{Va}{R3}+\frac{(Va-Vout)}{R2} = 0

And the same think we can do for Vout

\frac{(Vout-Va)}{R2}+\frac{Vout}{R4} = 0

Simply I assume that all the current leaving the node. If so this means that the voltage at this node has to be be the highest.

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?...+++(A+-+B)/100+=+0+,+B/100+++(B+-+A)/100+=+0+
 

Attachments

  • 1213.PNG
    1213.PNG
    1.4 KB · Views: 521
Last edited:


Hello,

Thévenin's Equivalent Circuit is a useful concept in circuit analysis that allows us to simplify complex circuits into a single voltage source and a single resistance. It is based on the principle that any linear circuit can be represented by an equivalent circuit with a single voltage source and a single resistance.

In your case, it seems that there may be some errors in your calculations. The equivalent resistance between nodes a and b is indeed 1.6 ohms, as you have correctly calculated. However, your nodal analysis and mesh analysis equations do not seem to be consistent with each other.

In nodal analysis, the voltage at node V2 should be equal to the voltage at node V3 plus 10V, as you have correctly stated. However, in your mesh analysis, you have set the voltage at node V2 to be equal to 0V. This may be the reason for the discrepancy in your results.

I would recommend double-checking your equations and making sure that they are consistent. It may also be helpful to redraw the circuit and label all the nodes and branches to make it easier to track the voltages and currents.

I hope this helps and good luck with your studies! Remember, Thévenin's Equivalent Circuit is a powerful tool in circuit analysis, so keep practicing and you will get the hang of it.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...

Similar threads

Back
Top