How to determine convergence and divergence

MHrtz
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
I've been having some trouble understanding how to determine if a sequence is divergent or convergent. For example

an = cos(2/n)

I know if I take the limit as n ->\infty then I will get 1. So the sequence has a limit but does having a limit mean that the sequence is convergent.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi MHrtz! :smile:

Yes, saying that a sequence has a limit (which should not be infinity) is equivalent to saying that the sequence converges.
If the limit doesn't exist (or is infinite), then the sequence diverges.
 
What about other sequences like

an {1 n = 2k k is an integer
{0 otherwise

It's divergent only sometimes right?
 
MHrtz said:
What about other sequences like

an {1 n = 2k k is an integer
{0 otherwise

It's divergent only sometimes right?

A sequence is either convergent or divergent. There's no such thing as divergent "only sometimes". This particular sequence is divergent since it doesn't come close to any number.
 
Ok, so i did some more problems and came across this one:

an = (1 + 2/n)n

When I took the limit I though it was 1 but the book said that the limit was e2. How is this possible?
 
The problem is that you probably reason as follows:

(1+2/n) goes to 1, n goes to infinity, so (1+2/n)n goes to 1^{+\infty}=1. The problem is however that 1^{+\infty} is an undetermined form and does not equal 1! Check your calculator, if you type in large values of n, then you'll see that (1+2/n)n does not go to 1!

How to solve this problem then. Well, it depends on what you seen.
Some students have (1+1/n)^n\rightarrow e as a separate formula. Then you just need to transform (1+2/n)n into something of the form (1+1/m)m (hint: m=n/2)

If you haven't seen that separate formula, then you can always do

(1+2/n)^n=e^{n\log(1+2/n)}

so you just need to show that

n\log(1+2/n)\rightarrow 2
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top