How to determine if a binary relation R on M is a bisimulation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dragonfall
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Binary Relation
Dragonfall
Messages
1,023
Reaction score
5
Let M be a system (possibly proper class-sized directed graph where the class of children of a given node is a set). A binary relation R on M is a BISIMULATION if R\subset R', where for a, b\in M

aR'b \Leftrightarrow ((\forall x \in a_M\exists y\in b_M xRy) \wedge (\forall x \in b_M\exists y\in a_M xRy))

where a_M is the set of children of a in M.

So let ~ be the relation on the class of all sets V such that a~b iff there exists an accessible pointed graph that is the picture of both a and b.

An accessible pointed graph is a directed graph with a distinguished node from where every other node is connected by a path.

Show that ~ is a bisimulation.

I'm not sure what bisimulation says. Can someone explain it in more familiar terms?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The wording above (quoted from the book) is very bad. It took me a long time to understand that R is a bisimulation if R is contained in the ' operation.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top