How to Determine the Axis of Rotation

AI Thread Summary
To determine the rotational kinetic energy of a system with two different masses attached to a massless bar and springs, the choice of axis for rotation is flexible and should be based on convenience. The total kinetic energy can be calculated by summing the kinetic energies of the individual masses, regardless of the chosen axis. The axis affects the distribution of kinetic energy into rotational and linear components but does not change the total kinetic energy. For calculations, it is beneficial to select an axis where the moment of inertia is known. Understanding the system's dynamics through Lagrangian mechanics can also aid in analyzing the potential and kinetic energies involved.
Diracobama2181
Messages
70
Reaction score
3
Let's say I have a massless bar of length ##l## with two different masses, ##m_1## and ##m_2##. Suppose an identical spring is attached to each individual mass, with the other end being attached to the ceiling. How would I go about determining the rotational kinetic energy of the system. Do I choose the axis about the center or the center of mass?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Diracobama2181 said:
Summary: When determining the kinetic energy of a rotating system, which point should I use as an axis to determine rotation kinetic energy.

Let's say I have a massless bar of length ##l## with two different masses, ##m_1## and ##m_2##. Suppose an identical spring is attached to each individual mass, with the other end being attached to the ceiling. How would I go about determining the rotational kinetic energy of the system. Do I choose the axis about the center or the center of mass?
If your goal is to determine the kinetic energy of the system, there is no need to bother with an axis of rotation. You have two masses. Add up their kinetic energies.
 
Diracobama2181 said:
When determining the kinetic energy of a rotating system, which point should I use as an axis to determine rotation kinetic energy.
The chosen axis merely determines how much of the kinetic energy is considered "rotational", and how much "linear". Their sum (total KE) won't change.

You should choose an axis which is most convenient. For example, the one for which you know the moment of inertia, which is needed for the rotational KE calculation:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotational_energy
 
  • Like
Likes jbriggs444
Diracobama2181 said:
Summary: When determining the kinetic energy of a rotating system, which point should I use as an axis to determine rotation kinetic energy.

Let's say I have a massless bar of length ##l## with two different masses, ##m_1## and ##m_2##. Suppose an identical spring is attached to each individual mass, with the other end being attached to the ceiling. How would I go about determining the rotational kinetic energy of the system. Do I choose the axis about the center or the center of mass?

We can assume a flat motion system. Then we have 3 independent variables in the context of an inertial coordinate system : (x,y) for the position of the center of masses and φ for the bar's angle. From this information you can calculate the potential energy due to gravity an due to the strings and complete the Lagrangian as L=KineticEnergy-PotentialEnergy; where KineticEnergy is the sum of the kinetic energy of the center of masses plus rotational energy relative to the center of masses = 1/2 I (dφ/dt)^2 and I= moment of inertia relative to the center of masses.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top