How to Determine the Hamiltonian for a Two-Level System with Tunneling?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Juan Carlos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    System
Juan Carlos
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hi!
I'm having problems with this simple problem:

Consider two level system: a box divided by a thin membrane. Let
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi!
I'm having problems with this simple problem:

Consider two level system: a box containing one particle, the box is divided by a thin membrane. Let Ψ1 and Ψ2 the probability amplitude (time-dependent only) of being on the left and right side. The particle can tunnel through the partition: so the next condition holds:

ihΨ2=K*Ψ1 where =Temporal partial derivate
K=constant

Using this condition I have to write the most general hamiltonian of the system.

Of course the wave function is:
Ψ(t)=Ψ1⎪L〉+ Ψ1⎪R〉

And the hamiltonian should be a 2x2 matrix. So I think that the actual problem is determine the matrix elements.

I've tried to use the Schordinger's equation directly:

ih Ψ(t) = ih Ψ1⎪L〉+ ih Ψ1⎪R〉= H Ψ1⎪L〉+H Ψ1⎪R〉 (Using linearity)
And using the condition:

ih Ψ1⎪L〉+ K*Ψ1⎪R〉= H Ψ1⎪L〉+H Ψ1⎪R〉

And then?

Help Please!

Note: I know the general matrix form for the Hamiltonian, but… that is what I'm trying to look for…
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top