How to Determine the Transmission Coefficient for a Rectangular Barrier?

maggicmike660
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Determine the transmission coefficient for a rectangular barrier. Treat seperately the three cases E<Vo, E>Vo, and E=Vo.

Homework Equations


V(x)= +Vo if -a<xa
V(x)= 0 otherwise

Transmission coefficient=(amplitude of transmited wave)2/(amplitude of incoming wave)2

I am also using the Time independent Schrodinger equation

The Attempt at a Solution



What I did for each case was to solve the Schrodinger equation in the following regions:

a) x<-a
b) -a<x<a
c) x>a

After doing this I exploited the fact that my solutions had to be continuous at the boundaries. The derivatives also had to be continuous at the boundaries.

ie)\Psi(a)-=\Psi(a)+ and,

d/dx(\Psi(a)-)=d/dx(\Psi(a)+

After doing this I get a bunch of equations and my goal is to isolate the amplitude of transmiited wave function and the amplitude of the initial wave function. I think that after a bunch of tedious algebra I will be able to isolate for the desired things.

Is there an easier way to isolate my amplitudes? My professor mentioned something about treating the even and odd solutions of the wavefunctions seperately, but I do not know what he means.

If any of this is unclear please let me know!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
maggicmike660 said:
I think that after a bunch of tedious algebra I will be able to isolate for the desired things.

This method will work. I solved this problem before, and if I recall correctly, it did require very tedious algebra.

This problem is a common one in introductory QM. Many texts and websites give the final result without derivation, so you can consult those for guidance toward the final answer should get stuck.
 
Thanks for the tip. I just got home after working on it and yes it does just require tedious algebra. Not difficult otherwise.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top