How to Determine Velocities for Rolling Objects on an Inclined Plane?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the velocities of a cylinder and a sphere rolling down an inclined plane, it's essential to apply conservation of mechanical energy while considering their moments of inertia. The kinetic energy for both objects includes contributions from both translational motion and rotation. The frictional force, necessary for rolling without slipping, does not perform work in this scenario. It's crucial to account for the kinetic energy associated with the motion of the center of mass, as this influences the total energy calculation. Understanding these principles clarifies the relationship between the objects' motion and their respective velocities.
Granger
Messages
165
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


Side by side on the top of an incline plan with height=2 meters a cylinder (Ic= MR^2/2) and a sphere (Ie=2MR^2/5) with equal radius, that come down to the base, rolling without slipping. Mass of the cylinder = 2.0 kg; Mass of a sphere=4.0 kg.

Homework Equations



$$K_r= 1/2 I \omega ^2$$
For rolling without slipping $$v=\omega R$$

The Attempt at a Solution


At first I thought this was a pretty linear problem.
Applying both equations to both the sphere and the cylinder:

$$K= 1/4 M_c v_c^2$$
$$K= 1/5 M_e v_e^2$$

Than I applied conservation of mechanical energy to determine velocity. However this is not correct since we don't know if there is a friction force (in fact we find out in the next question that it has).
So how should I proceed in this case to determine the velocities?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You forgot about the energy due to the motion of the centre of mass.

The frictional force does no work since the objects are rolling without slipping.

Edit: You have also not stated what the actual question is ...
 
I realized I was understanding the concept wrongly. Even though the ball is not slipping the center of mass moves so it has a kinetic energy associated, right?
It has nothing to do with the ball slipping.
Thanks!
 
Granger said:
I realized I was understanding the concept wrongly. Even though the ball is not slipping the center of mass moves so it has a kinetic energy associated, right?
Yes. In general the total kinetic energy can be written as the energy related to the motion of the centre of mass and an additional piece due to the rotation (using the moment of inertia relative to the centre of mass).

Granger said:
It has nothing to do with the ball slipping.
If the ball was slipping you would have to worry about frictional forces (unless specified that friction can be neglected). In order for the ball to roll, there needs to be friction, but it will not perform any work if the ball rolls without slipping.
 
  • Like
Likes Granger
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top