How to do this logarithm proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter davedave
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithm Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the equation L + M + N = LMN - 2, where L, M, and N are logarithmic expressions defined in terms of x, y, and z. The initial approach involves converting the logarithmic equations into exponential form and manipulating them to combine terms. The goal is to express the left side of the resulting equation as (xyz)^(L+M+N) to complete the proof. A suggestion is made to derive L, M, and N using natural logarithms to facilitate the proof. The conversation highlights the challenge of achieving the desired form and invites alternative methods for the proof.
davedave
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
This is not a homework question. I just try it for enjoyment.

Let L = log to the base x of (yz) M = log to the base y of (xz) and
N = log to the base z of (xy)

This is how I do it without much luck.

I put all the equations in exponential form

yz = x^L xz = y^M xy = z^N

raise the right-hand sides of the equations to the required power so that x y z will have a product of LMN in the exponent.

(yz)^(MN) = x^(LMN) (xz)^(LN) = y^(LMN) (xy)^(LM) = z^(LMN)


combining the equations gives (yz)^(MN) * (xz)^(LN) * (xy)^(LM) = (xyz)^(LMN)

now, multiply both sides of the equation to (xyz)^-2 and rearrange the terms

x^(L(M+N)-2) * y^(M(L+N)-2) * z^(N(L+M)-2) = (xyz)^(LMN-2)

But, if I could make the left side of the equation above into (xyz)^(L+M+N), then that would complete the proof.

Can someone think of any other way of doing this proof? Thanks.

sorry about my omission.

Here is the question.

Prove that L + M + N = LMN - 2
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What exactly is the proof you are looking to do?
 
The equation x^L = y*z gives L = ln(y*z)/ln(x) = [ln(y) + ln(z)]/ln(x), etc.

RGV
 
Back
Top