How to estimate the performance of a pump using Navier Stokes?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on estimating pump performance using the Navier-Stokes equations, with participants reviewing a homework problem and the author's attempts. Initial feedback indicates that the approach taken appears reasonable and no major errors are noted. One participant plans to conduct a more thorough review later, while suggesting another member with fluid dynamics expertise might provide additional insights. Ultimately, the detailed review confirms the calculations are correct, with a minor suggestion regarding the treatment of a variable. The conversation emphasizes collaborative problem-solving in fluid mechanics.
owlwise2010
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Fluid Mechanics Homework:
Flows between two horizontal parallel plates
apart. The upper plate is moving with a uniform speed U, while the lower one is kept stationary. A constant pressure gradient of dp/dx is applied
Relevant Equations
Navier Stokes and Volumetric flow
Hello everyone,
Attached is the homework problem (FluidHmk.PNG) as well as the attempt (Attempted 1 and 2).

Just wanted to know if this is method to approach the problem

Thanks in advance.
 

Attachments

  • FluidHmk.PNG
    FluidHmk.PNG
    26 KB · Views: 406
  • Attempted.PNG
    Attempted.PNG
    48.5 KB · Views: 401
  • Attempted2.PNG
    Attempted2.PNG
    51.9 KB · Views: 395
Physics news on Phys.org
Your approach looks very reasonable to me based on a quick glance over everything. I don't have time right now to actually go through and check the numbers, but it seems that you've taken the correct view of the problem, and nothing jumps out at me as being obviously incorrect.

I'll try to check back later this evening when I have more time to actually look over it in more depth if nobody else has a chance. In the meantime, maybe @boneh3ad has time to take a look (he's one of the only other people I'm aware of on the forum with a fluids background)?
 
I finally got a chance to go through in more detail, and it all looks correct to me. I might have left the factor of l in a while longer rather than just calling it 1, but the problem statement didn't actually specify that it needed to be in terms of l (and it fundamentally doesn't change anything about the problem), so this seems fine to me.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top