How to Evaluate [A*A, A] Given [A, A*] = 1?

chill_factor
Messages
898
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement



Consider the operator A and its Hermitian adjoint A*.

If [A,A*] = 1, evaluate: [A*A,A]

Homework Equations



standard rules of linear algebra, operator algebra and quantum mechanics

The Attempt at a Solution



[A,A*] = AA* - A*A = 1

A*A = (1+AA*)

[A*A,A] = AA*A - A*AA = ??

How do I even start?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi chill_factor,

If we expand [A*A,A], we obtain A*AA-AA*A. Do you see a way to factor this that might allow you to use the [A,A*] commutator?
 
jmcelve said:
Hi chill_factor,

If we expand [A*A,A], we obtain A*AA-AA*A. Do you see a way to factor this that might allow you to use the [A,A*] commutator?

Thank you for answering. I think I see it. There is an A on the right side of both the A*AA and AA*A operators so A*AA - AA*A = (A*A-AA*)A = -[A,A*]A = -A. Is that right?

I guess my mistake was writing the commutator out incorrectly.
 
chill_factor said:
Thank you for answering. I think I see it. There is an A on the right side of both the A*AA and AA*A operators so A*AA - AA*A = (A*A-AA*)A = -[A,A*]A = -A. Is that right?

I guess my mistake was writing the commutator out incorrectly.

Yep. You've got it. Nice work.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top