How to factor 6w^2 - 5wt - 4t^2

  • Thread starter Thread starter zeion
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around factoring the quadratic expression 6w^2 - 5wt - 4t^2. Participants explore methods and reasoning related to factoring polynomials, particularly when the leading coefficient is not one.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to factor the expression using trial and error and questions the existence of a general rule for such factorizations. Some participants discuss the ac method for factoring quadratics and the importance of identifying factors that relate to the coefficients. Others inquire about the proof of the method used for factoring.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various approaches to factoring the quadratic, with some participants providing insights into established methods like the ac method. There is an ongoing exploration of the limitations of factoring, particularly regarding rational and irrational roots, without reaching a consensus on a single method.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenges of factoring quadratics with non-unit leading coefficients and the potential need for trial and error, as well as the implications of irrational or complex roots on the factorization process.

zeion
Messages
455
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Factor [tex]6w^2 - 5wt - 4t^2[/tex]

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



[tex]= 6w^2 + 3wt - 8wt - 4t^2[/tex]
[tex]= 3w(2w + t) - 4t(2w + t)[/tex]
[tex]= (3w - 4t)(2w + t)[/tex]

I was able to figure out what to use for splitting up the -5wt after a lot of trial and errors, but I was just wondering if there was a general rule for finding out what to use to factor things in this form?

I noticed that I needed them to be opposite signs and is half of the coefficient of the first term and twice of the last.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For quadratics where the leading coefficient isn't 1, you'll often use the ac method where you multiply a and c, then find the factors of the result that add up to b. Notice that you split up the middle coefficient -5 into 3 and -8, which are two factors of 24, or the product of 6 and -4.

If that didn't make sense, just take a look on Google or read up on it http://people.richland.edu/james/misc/acmeth.html" .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is there a proof for this method?
 
If you're given some quadratic ax2+bx+c it can be proven that it can't always be factorized into the form [itex]a(x-\alpha)(x-\beta)[/itex] where [itex]\alpha[/itex] and [itex]\beta[/itex] are rational numbers, which is why factorizing can only be done through trial and error, because if they are either irrational or complex then the usual factorizing process won't work and you need to use the quadratic formula.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K