How to figure out a equation given the variables

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kennyh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Figure Variables
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving a formula for final velocity (vf) using the variables time (t), initial position (xi), final position (xf), and acceleration (a). The initial attempt using the equation vf = vi + at was deemed incorrect. A revised approach involved manipulating the kinematic equations, leading to the realization that the correct relationship is (xf - xi) - (1/2at^2) = vi*t. By substituting vi back into the equation and rearranging, the final expression for vf was derived as ((xf - xi) - (1/2at^2)/t) + at = vf. This highlights the importance of correctly applying kinematic equations to solve for unknown variables.
Kennyh
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Starting from the constant-acceleration kinematic equations, write a formula that gives vf in terms of t, xi, xf, and a.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I tried using vf = vi + at but it was incorrect. Is there another way where i can solve for vf using the 4 needed variable above? thanks
Also I have tried using this : (xf-xi)+(1/2at) = vi then substitute vi with this equation vf = vi+at. After that I got (xf-xi)+at = vf but it was still incorrect.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
(xf-xi)+(1/2at) = vi
This equation is wrong.
It should be
(xf-xi)-(1/2at^2) = vi*t
From the equation vf = vi + at find vi and put it in the above equation and rearrange to get vf
 
what I got was ((xf-xi)-(1/2at^2)/t))+at = vf
 
Kennyh said:
what I got was ((xf-xi)-(1/2at^2)/t))+at = vf

vi*t = (vf - at)t = vf*t -a*t^2
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top