How to Find Local Linear Increase in Lens Field Data?

AI Thread Summary
To find the local linear increase in lens field data, the discussion focuses on analyzing field curvature data that includes vectors such as Y height, Tan Shift, Sag Shift, Real Height, Ref. Height, and Distortion. The local linear increase is defined as the ratio of a small object's size at any distance from the lens center to its size at the center. The Real Height to Ref. Height ratio was initially considered but determined not to be the correct answer. The conversation highlights the need for additional information to clarify the calculations and emphasizes that the relative local linear increase at Y = 0 is set to 1. Understanding these relationships is crucial for accurate lens field analysis.
Evgenii
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hello!
I need to find a local linear increase in the field of the lens.

I have Listing of Field Curvature Data.

It contains vectors of - Y height, Tan Shift, Sag Shift, Real Height, Ref. Height, Distortion.

I can not understand how these data get what I need.

Homework Equations



Local linear increase in the field of the lens is the ratio of the size of a small object (in the limit of the size tends to zero) located at any distance from the lens center (in this case, the axis Y) to its size in the middle of the field.

The Attempt at a Solution



Real Height/Ref. Height ratio is close to Distortion, but not equal, may be it is answer?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry you are not finding help at the moment. Is there any additional information you can share with us?
 
These data appear as those that are presented here:
http://www.johnloomis.org/eop601/designs/kidger1/zemax.html

In section Listing of Field Curvature Data.

Real Height/Ref. Height ratio is not the answer.
Relative local linear increase in the center of Y = 0 is taken as 1.

Sorry, that's all.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top