How to Find the Change in Helmholtz Energy for an Isothermal Gas Expansion?

AI Thread Summary
To find the change in Helmholtz energy (A) for an isothermal gas expansion from 20 L to 40 L at 300 K, the fourth fundamental thermodynamic equation dA = -PdV - SdT is utilized, with the isothermal condition simplifying the equation to dA = -PdV. The pressure P is derived from the gas's equation of state, P = (nRT/V) - (an²/V²), allowing for integration over the volume change. The integration yields the expression for A, which includes terms for the natural logarithm of the volume ratio and a correction for the parameter 'a'. The final calculated change in Helmholtz energy is A = -1733.85 J, although the accuracy of the integral's second term is questioned and requires verification.
Youngster
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The 4 fundamental equations of thermodynamics are:

dE = TdS - PdV
dH = TdS + VdP
dG = VdP - SdT
dA = - PdV - SdT


Supose a gas obeys the equation of state

P = \frac{nRT}{V} - \frac{an^{2}}{V^{2}}

Use one of the fundamental equations to find the change in Helmholtz energy (A) when one mole of gas expands isothermally from 20 L to 40 L at 300 K. Let a = 0.1 Pa m6 mol-2. (1 L = 10-3 m3).

Homework Equations



Well the four fundamental equations should be a given. In particular, the fourth one for Helmholtz energy dA.

The Attempt at a Solution



Well I tried integrating the fourth fundamental equation

\intdA = -\intPdV -\intSdT

And since the process is isothermal, the last term is zero, and the Helmholtz energy is just the product of the pressure P and the change in volume ΔV.

But how would I obtain the pressure P? My first guess would be to plug in the known values into the equation of state:

P = \frac{nRT}{V} - \frac{an^{2}}{V^{2}}

I'm letting R = 8.314 \frac{Pa m^{3}}{K mol} since that would lead to a dimensionally correct answer in Pa. My problem is what to plug in for volume considering I have two values.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Youngster said:
But how would I obtain the pressure P? My first guess would be to plug in the known values into the equation of state:

P = \frac{nRT}{V} - \frac{an^{2}}{V^{2}}
Yes. But just plug the expression in the integral, substitute the values in the end.

My problem is what to plug in for volume considering I have two values.

Well, what do you think? :rolleyes:

You are integrating with respect to volume. Do you know about definite integrals?
 
Yep! This was actually a very DOH! moment for me.

So I forgot that I can just plug in the equation of state and write P in terms of V.

This leads to the differential equation:
-\intdA = \int\frac{nRT}{V}-\frac{an^{2}}{v^{2}}dV,

from 20L to 40L

This comes out as
nRT ln(\frac{V_{2}}{V_{1}})+\frac{an^{2}}{V_{2}-V_{1}}

And plugging in, I come up with A = -1733.85 Pa m^{3} = -1733.85 J

Does this look good?
 
Youngster said:
This comes out as
nRT ln(\frac{V_{2}}{V_{1}})+\frac{an^{2}}{V_{2}-V_{1}}

I suggest you to check this again. The second part doesn't look correct. What is ##\displaystyle \int \frac{1}{x^2}dx##?
 
Last edited:
Pranav-Arora said:
I suggest you to check this again. The second part doesn't look correct. What is ##\displaystyle \int \frac{1}{x^2}dx##?

-\int\frac{1}{x}

I understand - From 20L to 40L, the later term should have the difference \frac{1}{V_{2}} - \frac{1}{V_{1}} multiplied by an^{2}
 
Youngster said:
-\int\frac{1}{x}
You mean -1/x?
I understand - From 20L to 40L, the later term should have the difference \frac{1}{V_{2}} - \frac{1}{V_{1}} multiplied by an^{2}
Check again, you missed the minus sign.

When you solve ##\displaystyle \int_a^b \frac{1}{x^2} dx##, you get
$$-\left(\frac{1}{b}-\frac{1}{a}\right)$$
Do you see how?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top